Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="rogueattorney" data-source="post: 1643588" data-attributes="member: 17551">Shouldn't this entirely depend on the combat situation?Face to face battle between a small number of small and/or inexperienced foes shoud be quick and deadly.  Whoever gets the first sword stroke in will probably win the day.A professional army laying siege to a well-provisioned and defended city will take days or even months.Obviously, this is the two extremes of the question.  I guess what I'm saying is that combat should take as long as it needs to take.  A well-planned ambush that's over in one or two rounds can be just as satisfying as a thirty round epic battle featuring multiple waves and tide-turning shifts.  Variety is the spice of life (or death in this case).R.A.</blockquote>