Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
How long would it take for the effects of massive radiation to show up?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Majere" data-source="post: 1411634" data-attributes="member: 13916"><p>Hmmm</p><p>1) Its a game.. its YOUR game, make it up</p><p></p><p>2) GAH NONONO STOP IT too much pidgeon science</p><p></p><p>- Dont say things like "iron weighs more than lead" It all depends on how much you have, If I have a piece of lead with a mass of a tonne, and iron with a mass of 1 gramme then the lead weighs more than the iron in the same gravitational field. If I take the piece of iron to a neutorn star and leave the lead on earth then the iron weighs more than the lead. (which is a much more interesting state of affairs)</p><p>What you are talking about is the DENSITY, i.e. comparing the MASSESS of items of the same size made of different materials. The densit metals are invariabley transition metals due to a good packing density, low atomic radius and higer atmoics weights. </p><p>Cesium has a very low denstiy.. it will almost float on water dues to a primative cubic packing in the ions (Its BCC if I remeber last terms class). </p><p></p><p>-Radioactivity has nothing to do with atomic numder directly. There are radioactive isotopes of hydrogen (atomic number 1). Its to do with the balance of nucelons and binding energies. There appear to be patterns of stability and it is hypothesised that nucelons may exist in semistable shells not unlike electrons which leads to hopes of producing "stable" nuclei of superheavy atoms. Almost all elements have radioactive isotopes, however the more radiative ones, by virtue of emiiting more radiation, dont last as long. The majority of long halflife radioisotopes are gamma-emmiters. </p><p></p><p>-alpha and beta radiation is mostly harmless unless you inhale the radioisotope, they are too strongly ionising to penetrate more than a few centimeteres of air. </p><p></p><p>-I doubt we would die without exposure to radiation.. we may however stop evolving which is a much more interesting thought. I dont know of any life form that in anyway harnessess radiation in a biological process.. but It would be amazing if there were such a creature. </p><p></p><p>3) Yes I know I sound like a nerd and a loser, it comes with being a chemistry undergrad. Would be very interested to hear more about the biological effects of hyperexposure. </p><p></p><p></p><p>Majere</p><p>Shoots all the pidgeons.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Majere, post: 1411634, member: 13916"] Hmmm 1) Its a game.. its YOUR game, make it up 2) GAH NONONO STOP IT too much pidgeon science - Dont say things like "iron weighs more than lead" It all depends on how much you have, If I have a piece of lead with a mass of a tonne, and iron with a mass of 1 gramme then the lead weighs more than the iron in the same gravitational field. If I take the piece of iron to a neutorn star and leave the lead on earth then the iron weighs more than the lead. (which is a much more interesting state of affairs) What you are talking about is the DENSITY, i.e. comparing the MASSESS of items of the same size made of different materials. The densit metals are invariabley transition metals due to a good packing density, low atomic radius and higer atmoics weights. Cesium has a very low denstiy.. it will almost float on water dues to a primative cubic packing in the ions (Its BCC if I remeber last terms class). -Radioactivity has nothing to do with atomic numder directly. There are radioactive isotopes of hydrogen (atomic number 1). Its to do with the balance of nucelons and binding energies. There appear to be patterns of stability and it is hypothesised that nucelons may exist in semistable shells not unlike electrons which leads to hopes of producing "stable" nuclei of superheavy atoms. Almost all elements have radioactive isotopes, however the more radiative ones, by virtue of emiiting more radiation, dont last as long. The majority of long halflife radioisotopes are gamma-emmiters. -alpha and beta radiation is mostly harmless unless you inhale the radioisotope, they are too strongly ionising to penetrate more than a few centimeteres of air. -I doubt we would die without exposure to radiation.. we may however stop evolving which is a much more interesting thought. I dont know of any life form that in anyway harnessess radiation in a biological process.. but It would be amazing if there were such a creature. 3) Yes I know I sound like a nerd and a loser, it comes with being a chemistry undergrad. Would be very interested to hear more about the biological effects of hyperexposure. Majere Shoots all the pidgeons. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
How long would it take for the effects of massive radiation to show up?
Top