Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
How long would it take to mine a gold vein in medieval times?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="MNblockhead" data-source="post: 8682228" data-attributes="member: 6796661"><p>Ha! A typo that works.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Well, "quickly" is a bit subjective when talking about leveling up. I would say that we level up much much more slowly than what is typical for 5e with standard XP. The campaign has been running three years and eight months as of this month and with the XP from the this gold vein the PC will hit 17th level. What is interesting about this campaign is that leveling is very swingy and unpredictable. You can defeat a powerful foe who has little or no loot. Occasionally, you'll come accross something of great value that requires almost no combat challenge (other than the weeks or months of in-game time exploring and surviving the dungeon). </p><p></p><p>What I like about this is that it rewards multiple styles of play. The exploration pillar, planning, and avoidance can pay bigger dividends than taking on every powerful foe you come across or learn about. As an example, to get to the point where the party was able to extract this gold for XP involved a party of mostly 16th level PC and little over 24 hours of play over three months, with downtime activity and preparation in between. The original goal wasn't to extract the gold. They didn't know about the gold at first, and could have easily missed it. They discovered this set of caverns through exploration and learned that it let to an entrance to subterranean city of Orcus-worshipping goblins that they have been working on defeating since tier one levels and for over two years of play. Their goal was to clear out the powerful guardians of this level and set up a force to further isolate the city and cut it off from supplies and as a base of operations to capture the city once and for all. </p><p></p><p>I like how these are now very powerful PCs, who started at level zero, based in a small backwater river town, took over a nearby ruined castle after clearing out the goblins who were using it as a base of operations for raiding that town. They repaired and improved the castle, set up establishments, and slowly built a town around them. That town being mostly the families of troops they've attracted and hired, all in support of defeating and clearing out a nearby dungeon and stronghold of followers of Orcus. This all requires funds. Lots of funds. I like how gold actually means something in this campaign. It helps drive the story. I just makes sense that it is tied to experience and leveling. </p><p></p><p>My first two campaigns did not use XP for GP. My first used milestone leveling. My second used a kind of hybrid system where the PC got points for a mixture of places explored/found, mcguffins recovered, and enemies defeated. All three approached have been more satisfying to me than that standard XP for defeating monsters and challenges.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Not sure. I would highly abstract it by giving percentage improvements. I'm thinking I would rather reduce the costs (equipment is more durable) and maybe a small improvement to mining times (better equipment is a bit more efficient, but a lot of that due to less time on maintenance). But I'm not sure the cost of enchanting weapons is worth the increased speed. Spells are more interesting and a bit more complicated to determine how much they would improve things. Also, could some of the spells actually ruin the metal? And again is it worth the cost? </p><p></p><p>In my campaign, a lot is spent on infrastructure. Especially in building. It is abstracted using the Strongholds and Followers Rules, but part of how I explain why that build times are unrealistic when looked at from a strictly historical lens is the use of magic. Control flame, dancing lights, guidance, mage hand, mending, message, mold earth, prestidigitation, shape water, and spare the dying are all cantrips and would have profound effects on the efficiency and effectiveness of construction work. Depending on how much of a high-magic campaign your are running, even low-level spells would be well worth the cost to apply to important construction work: feather fall, floating disk, immovable object, create or destroy water, cure wounds, grease, healing word, unseen servant, alter self, enlarge/reduce, levitate, misty step, shatter, spider climb, etc. All of these would be game changers without having to get to 3rd and 4th level spells like fabricate, conjure minor elemental, daylight, fly, giant insect, haste, stone shape, summon elemental/construct, etc.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="MNblockhead, post: 8682228, member: 6796661"] Ha! A typo that works. Well, "quickly" is a bit subjective when talking about leveling up. I would say that we level up much much more slowly than what is typical for 5e with standard XP. The campaign has been running three years and eight months as of this month and with the XP from the this gold vein the PC will hit 17th level. What is interesting about this campaign is that leveling is very swingy and unpredictable. You can defeat a powerful foe who has little or no loot. Occasionally, you'll come accross something of great value that requires almost no combat challenge (other than the weeks or months of in-game time exploring and surviving the dungeon). What I like about this is that it rewards multiple styles of play. The exploration pillar, planning, and avoidance can pay bigger dividends than taking on every powerful foe you come across or learn about. As an example, to get to the point where the party was able to extract this gold for XP involved a party of mostly 16th level PC and little over 24 hours of play over three months, with downtime activity and preparation in between. The original goal wasn't to extract the gold. They didn't know about the gold at first, and could have easily missed it. They discovered this set of caverns through exploration and learned that it let to an entrance to subterranean city of Orcus-worshipping goblins that they have been working on defeating since tier one levels and for over two years of play. Their goal was to clear out the powerful guardians of this level and set up a force to further isolate the city and cut it off from supplies and as a base of operations to capture the city once and for all. I like how these are now very powerful PCs, who started at level zero, based in a small backwater river town, took over a nearby ruined castle after clearing out the goblins who were using it as a base of operations for raiding that town. They repaired and improved the castle, set up establishments, and slowly built a town around them. That town being mostly the families of troops they've attracted and hired, all in support of defeating and clearing out a nearby dungeon and stronghold of followers of Orcus. This all requires funds. Lots of funds. I like how gold actually means something in this campaign. It helps drive the story. I just makes sense that it is tied to experience and leveling. My first two campaigns did not use XP for GP. My first used milestone leveling. My second used a kind of hybrid system where the PC got points for a mixture of places explored/found, mcguffins recovered, and enemies defeated. All three approached have been more satisfying to me than that standard XP for defeating monsters and challenges. Not sure. I would highly abstract it by giving percentage improvements. I'm thinking I would rather reduce the costs (equipment is more durable) and maybe a small improvement to mining times (better equipment is a bit more efficient, but a lot of that due to less time on maintenance). But I'm not sure the cost of enchanting weapons is worth the increased speed. Spells are more interesting and a bit more complicated to determine how much they would improve things. Also, could some of the spells actually ruin the metal? And again is it worth the cost? In my campaign, a lot is spent on infrastructure. Especially in building. It is abstracted using the Strongholds and Followers Rules, but part of how I explain why that build times are unrealistic when looked at from a strictly historical lens is the use of magic. Control flame, dancing lights, guidance, mage hand, mending, message, mold earth, prestidigitation, shape water, and spare the dying are all cantrips and would have profound effects on the efficiency and effectiveness of construction work. Depending on how much of a high-magic campaign your are running, even low-level spells would be well worth the cost to apply to important construction work: feather fall, floating disk, immovable object, create or destroy water, cure wounds, grease, healing word, unseen servant, alter self, enlarge/reduce, levitate, misty step, shatter, spider climb, etc. All of these would be game changers without having to get to 3rd and 4th level spells like fabricate, conjure minor elemental, daylight, fly, giant insect, haste, stone shape, summon elemental/construct, etc. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
How long would it take to mine a gold vein in medieval times?
Top