Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="LokiDR" data-source="post: 766478" data-attributes="member: 6239">First, I would like to say that I don't believe RS should stack with anything, from a conceptual point of view.You'll believe me that it stacks, but believe TWF is different than flurry?  You just convinced me that flurry replaces TWF for monks.  Now you have me confused.replacing TWF....This is where you are starting to break the analogy of TWF to flurry.  Same penalties (if you have the TWF feats), same concept, but the monk using only one monk weapon can use any body part to attack.Could a monk with 2 monk weapons perform TWF?  No, they have flurry....The quote given from the SRD disagrees.  If you have two monk weapons, the extra attack from flurry comes from the exta weapon.I won't argue that this makes a whole lot of sense.  But neither does TWF and rapid shot.  If you rule differently than the 'official' call, you are house ruling, which is fine.  However, I think the rules do not prevent you from doing flurry+RS, the same way they do not prevent TWF+RS.I hate monks.  Well, ok, I used to hate monks.  As they stand, I think the class has lots of problems.  I hope they fix the entire situation of unarmed BAB as well as flurry.As for flurry+RS, I see only the same restrictions against it as TWF+RS.  Because a monk can not flurry with a non-monk weapon, you would have to spend more on a special item or take quick draw.  Either way, from a balance perspective, they seem similar.</blockquote>

Verification