Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Runestar" data-source="post: 4786406" data-attributes="member: 72317">As many as it needs to let me represent my character concept properly in mechanical terms, IMO. If one class does the job, all the better. But if it cannot, then I see no reason to impose arbitrary limitations on how far I can multiclass.<img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile    :)"  data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" />Classes are a metagame concept to begin with. Fighters do not even need to have 1 lv in the fighter class. There is no shame in multiclassing between 2-3 base classes and 3-4 prcs if it will allow me to achieve my intended result, nor is there anything to feel proud about for staying in 1 base class all the way from lv1 to lv20. There is such a thing as too many crappy classes (such as the samurai) or classes which are pointless past a few lvs (eg: marshal, swashbuckler prior to daring outlaw). But that is more a case of poor design rather than a case of class glut.</blockquote>