Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
How many of you use the Identify material component?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Larcen" data-source="post: 209929" data-attributes="member: 2406"><p>No? Well, let me express what my concerns are then...</p><p></p><p><strong>>>> Rant mode is now ON <<<</strong></p><p></p><p>First, here are the actions listed in the PHB glossary under "action":</p><p></p><p>1) Standard Action</p><p>2) Partial Action</p><p>3) Move-equivalent Action</p><p>4) Free Action</p><p>5) Full Round Action (not to be confused with 1 full round)</p><p></p><p>And just for laughs, here are some of the actions listed not in the glossary, but in the index instead:</p><p></p><p>6) Ready Action</p><p>7) Refocus Action</p><p>8) Full Attack Action</p><p></p><p>So just off the top of my head what we have here are 8 (!) different actions so far. As there others I missed?</p><p></p><p>Why the heck are their so many??? <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f621.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":mad:" title="Mad :mad:" data-smilie="4"data-shortname=":mad:" /> </p><p></p><p>Now some of these are actions dependant on others, some of them affect your initiative, some of them cause AoOs, some you can take a 5' step with, some you can't, etc, etc, etc... </p><p></p><p>Sure, we have all <strong>learned</strong> to make sense of it all. But honestly, take a step back and look at this from the perspective of a newbie, or someone who just wants to have fun and not worry about these rule semantics.</p><p></p><p>I am sure we have all seen the many posts people have left on the boards asking about how this action or that action works. I have even seen a post were some guy wanted to do something, a Bull Rush or some such, but couldn't do it the way he was describing it to his DM using his limited knowledge of the action system. So in response someone else posted something to the affect of: "Ah, but had you announced to your dm THIS action instead of THAT one, and in THIS order, then yeah, your PC can do all that in one round." Argh. The poor guy just wanted to describe, in roleplaying terms, what the heck his character was doing, instead he got sucked into all this legalize. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f641.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":(" title="Frown :(" data-smilie="3"data-shortname=":(" /></p><p></p><p>Maybe I am just a little bit slow, but the first time I read the following definition in the glossary, I had to stop, go back, and think "what the hell did they just say?" Take a moment to read it to yourself now, but again do it with fresh eyes, like those of a someone just starting to learn the game. (For best affect, read it out loud. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" /> )</p><p></p><p>=====</p><p><strong>Move-equivalent action:</strong> An action that takes the place of moving at normal speed. A character can take a move-equivalent action instead of moving at normal speed in a standard action or as a partial action, or two move-equivalent actions instead of a double-move.</p><p>=====</p><p></p><p>This is just one example. Sure, if you go back and reread it a few times it makes sense, but my point is why all this unnecessary complication? Is this the best system they could come up with? There has to be a simpler way. If you don't have a problem using the system as is, I would guess it's only because you, like all of us, have survived the learning curve and are now living with it. But that does NOT make it a clean, simple, efficient, <strong>intuitive</strong> system.</p><p></p><p>Can I have an "Amen!", brothers and sisters? <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f600.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":D" title="Big grin :D" data-smilie="8"data-shortname=":D" /></p><p></p><p><strong>>>> Rant mode is now OFF <<<</strong></p><p></p><p>Er….sorry everyone. This has been a pet peeve of mine since I first read 3E.</p><p></p><p>Now back to your regularly scheduled thread… <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Larcen, post: 209929, member: 2406"] No? Well, let me express what my concerns are then... [b]>>> Rant mode is now ON <<<[/b] First, here are the actions listed in the PHB glossary under "action": 1) Standard Action 2) Partial Action 3) Move-equivalent Action 4) Free Action 5) Full Round Action (not to be confused with 1 full round) And just for laughs, here are some of the actions listed not in the glossary, but in the index instead: 6) Ready Action 7) Refocus Action 8) Full Attack Action So just off the top of my head what we have here are 8 (!) different actions so far. As there others I missed? Why the heck are their so many??? :mad: Now some of these are actions dependant on others, some of them affect your initiative, some of them cause AoOs, some you can take a 5' step with, some you can't, etc, etc, etc... Sure, we have all [b]learned[/b] to make sense of it all. But honestly, take a step back and look at this from the perspective of a newbie, or someone who just wants to have fun and not worry about these rule semantics. I am sure we have all seen the many posts people have left on the boards asking about how this action or that action works. I have even seen a post were some guy wanted to do something, a Bull Rush or some such, but couldn't do it the way he was describing it to his DM using his limited knowledge of the action system. So in response someone else posted something to the affect of: "Ah, but had you announced to your dm THIS action instead of THAT one, and in THIS order, then yeah, your PC can do all that in one round." Argh. The poor guy just wanted to describe, in roleplaying terms, what the heck his character was doing, instead he got sucked into all this legalize. :( Maybe I am just a little bit slow, but the first time I read the following definition in the glossary, I had to stop, go back, and think "what the hell did they just say?" Take a moment to read it to yourself now, but again do it with fresh eyes, like those of a someone just starting to learn the game. (For best affect, read it out loud. ;) ) ===== [b]Move-equivalent action:[/b] An action that takes the place of moving at normal speed. A character can take a move-equivalent action instead of moving at normal speed in a standard action or as a partial action, or two move-equivalent actions instead of a double-move. ===== This is just one example. Sure, if you go back and reread it a few times it makes sense, but my point is why all this unnecessary complication? Is this the best system they could come up with? There has to be a simpler way. If you don't have a problem using the system as is, I would guess it's only because you, like all of us, have survived the learning curve and are now living with it. But that does NOT make it a clean, simple, efficient, [b]intuitive[/b] system. Can I have an "Amen!", brothers and sisters? :D [b]>>> Rant mode is now OFF <<<[/b] Er….sorry everyone. This has been a pet peeve of mine since I first read 3E. Now back to your regularly scheduled thread… :) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
How many of you use the Identify material component?
Top