Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="seasong" data-source="post: 569730" data-attributes="member: 5137">This is why, for example, we have 5-level PrCs that can be qualified for at reasonably low levels.I agree with you on one thing (and, in fact, stated this above): a PrC should be fundamental to the character, a big part of who they are. It should not be taken lightly, or without strong justification. That makes it difficult for more than one PrC to fit, but not impossible.Add one thing: The last game, the characters in question spoke directly to their GOD. A generic world god, granted, but that's something the DM tossed in which is prompting a life change in the characters.Quel justification?You crazy, man, crazy. I pump out 2-5 thousand words a DAY and I couldn't manage that.I have lists of things in my head, broad concept statements if you will, that could eventually become an actual "prestige ability chain", but there's simply too many things I want to have available, from Orc War Drummer to Necromancer to Shield of Allas (sun god) to Warrior of Aphas (love god).And if a player comes up with a concept that fits my setting perfectly and is cool to boot, I'm going to deny it because I didn't come up with it? Heck no. That smacks of control freak beyond even my meager worth <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink    ;)"  data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" />.As mentioned, I do agree with some of what you say, but I think your position is too extremist.</blockquote>

Verification