Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
How many PrC is okay?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="barsoomcore" data-source="post: 573801" data-attributes="member: 812"><p>incognito:</p><p></p><p>What strikes me most about your comments is how you try and describe your experiences in broad generalizations. I think you'd find with much more sympathy if you simply explained your experiences. It sounds like you've gotten a pretty hard time from your players. That's unfortunate. But to make sweeping statements about all players or all prestige classes (or even most) only makes you look foolish, since we all know you haven't conducted any surveys or posted any sources for your information.</p><p></p><p>And more importantly, it doesn't matter. Your experiences are perfectly valid. As are your DM rulings on your campaign. If you don't want prestige classes in your campaign, fine. You should ban them.</p><p></p><p>But I should not ban them in MY campaign because of YOUR experiences, should I?</p><p></p><p>See? This is what I'm talking about. What you really mean is, "My players don't have the best intentions in mind. My players just want new toys." Because MY players, for example, emphatically do NOT. Which throws your whole argument out the window.</p><p></p><p>Why introduce this? Who cares what 'most of us' do? Tell us what YOU do. I'm interested.</p><p></p><p>Again, here you are making blanket statements about players that are patently untrue. What I understand you to be saying is that your players do not need to be involved. That if your players were to be involved in every aspect of the game, that your game would suffer.</p><p></p><p>I'm sure that's true. I'm just as sure that in my campaign the facts are different. My players are love to involve themselves in many aspects of the game. They come up with NPCs, plots, and yes, prestige classes. They enjoy it, and I enjoy it, and that's all the justification anyone needs in this game.</p><p></p><p>If your experiences have been negative, I'm sorry for you.</p><p></p><p>Again, what I hear you saying is how your campaigns have turned into rules arguments. That's unfortunate. It's apparent, however, from the other posts in this thread, that such a fate is not by any means inevitable. It is clearly possible for campaigns to involve players on many levels and still succeed.</p><p></p><p>Please understand I am not asking you defend your stance against prestige classes in your campaign. If they're not right for your group, then you are right to ban them. Just like I'm right to ban elves, dwarves, halflings, half-orcs and gnomes. You don't need any reason beyond "I'm the DM."</p><p></p><p>Who cares? It's your game. You don't need justifications and you can't build them out of flimsy generalizations. Talk about your experiences, your friends, your players and your campaign. We all want to hear that.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="barsoomcore, post: 573801, member: 812"] incognito: What strikes me most about your comments is how you try and describe your experiences in broad generalizations. I think you'd find with much more sympathy if you simply explained your experiences. It sounds like you've gotten a pretty hard time from your players. That's unfortunate. But to make sweeping statements about all players or all prestige classes (or even most) only makes you look foolish, since we all know you haven't conducted any surveys or posted any sources for your information. And more importantly, it doesn't matter. Your experiences are perfectly valid. As are your DM rulings on your campaign. If you don't want prestige classes in your campaign, fine. You should ban them. But I should not ban them in MY campaign because of YOUR experiences, should I? See? This is what I'm talking about. What you really mean is, "My players don't have the best intentions in mind. My players just want new toys." Because MY players, for example, emphatically do NOT. Which throws your whole argument out the window. Why introduce this? Who cares what 'most of us' do? Tell us what YOU do. I'm interested. Again, here you are making blanket statements about players that are patently untrue. What I understand you to be saying is that your players do not need to be involved. That if your players were to be involved in every aspect of the game, that your game would suffer. I'm sure that's true. I'm just as sure that in my campaign the facts are different. My players are love to involve themselves in many aspects of the game. They come up with NPCs, plots, and yes, prestige classes. They enjoy it, and I enjoy it, and that's all the justification anyone needs in this game. If your experiences have been negative, I'm sorry for you. Again, what I hear you saying is how your campaigns have turned into rules arguments. That's unfortunate. It's apparent, however, from the other posts in this thread, that such a fate is not by any means inevitable. It is clearly possible for campaigns to involve players on many levels and still succeed. Please understand I am not asking you defend your stance against prestige classes in your campaign. If they're not right for your group, then you are right to ban them. Just like I'm right to ban elves, dwarves, halflings, half-orcs and gnomes. You don't need any reason beyond "I'm the DM." Who cares? It's your game. You don't need justifications and you can't build them out of flimsy generalizations. Talk about your experiences, your friends, your players and your campaign. We all want to hear that. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
How many PrC is okay?
Top