Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="incognito" data-source="post: 576139" data-attributes="member: 7008">Repeated for barsoomcore: I have player 3E for ~2 years. Not the longest time, but not the shortest either. I have played in 4 groups, with no less that 12+(?) different players. While I cannot judge ALL players, or ALL campaigns, I feel I can make qualitative statements, based on logical arguments, that hold true for the majority of players or campains - not just the "special" ones... If this set of message board respondents wants to refute my assertations on the basis of "my campiagn does not run this way..." we have a basic communication/discussion breakdown. I cannot "prove a negative." However, can we agree that it is possible for someone of experience (not me, mind you, just "someone") to make a argument, based on logic, that should apply to the majority, even though the majority is not able to voice thier opinion in this message board?If I hear enough "no!'s" then I can give up now, since we cannot communicate effectively. If we can, I shall try harder to represent my arguments more logically or with more examples, or however the respondents might better like the argument/discussion presented.{/end of copy}Bar, while people may be interested in my specific campaign, I am not really interested, in a thread about game balance, in discussion how my game is or isn't working with certain rules.   I am open to talking about that in other threads tho - start one and I'll post!  So I make generalizations, becasue I am trying to relate to the general ENboard public - not you specifically.  I present logical arguments for you and others to tear down. (or agree with <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile    :)"  data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" />  ) Nope.  Completely disagree.  If you want to design a world without any PC races but human, there may be other broad changes that make ANY world view discussions invalid.  Consider this thread similar to one that reads "Is Haste balanced as written?"  If, in your campaign, there is no/very low magic - then clearly Haste cannot be.  So why speak to the point?</blockquote>

Verification