Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
How many sneak attacks?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Dursk Starkfire" data-source="post: 1249165" data-attributes="member: 7561"><p>Camarath, </p><p>I believe everybody is in agreement that invisibility ends after the first attack, irregardless of whether it is contained within a full-round attack. I think what is being questioned is whether the defender remains flat-footed from being attacked by an invisible opponent. I guess this would bring up the concept of having surprise rounds within rounds of combat. </p><p></p><p>If you consider that the defender is completely unaware of the invisible rogue, then combat could be technically considered to not have begun between the two. The defendent would probably be allowed spot/listen checks to see if he notices the invisible rogue before being attacked, and if he is unaware, the rogue should get a "surprise" round in the midst of combat. The problem with this is that it gets very difficult to administer multiple initiatives for multiple characters, and how to you judicate a surprise round in the midst of combat? Does the rogue get penalized with a standard action despite other combatants having a full round action available?</p><p></p><p>Let's take the following scenario: (Rogue init 24, Fighter init 12, Barbarian init 8). The Rogue (R) and Barbarian (B) are on the same side and are hiding out (invisible) in an alley for any inopportunistic travellers in order to relinquish their wealth.</p><p></p><p>surprise round:</p><p>BR F</p><p>R does nothing</p><p>B does nothing</p><p>F has no clue and walks beside R thinking that </p><p></p><p>round 1:</p><p>BRF</p><p>Rogue sneak attacks Fighter at full-attack bonus. R is visible after first attack. Following attacks apply sneak-attack damage as F is flat-footed (due to initiative). Fighter draws weapon and smacks R once. B moves into position and attacks F once.</p><p></p><p>round 2:</p><p>RF</p><p>B</p><p>R realizes he's in trouble, and leaves combat (3 rounds)</p><p>F attacks B (full-attack)</p><p>B attacks F (full-attack)</p><p></p><p>round 5:</p><p> F R</p><p>B</p><p>R drinks potion of invisibility and returns to combat (4 rounds)</p><p></p><p>round 9:</p><p> FR</p><p>B</p><p>R is not smart enough to flank with B, but moves into position to attack F.</p><p>F fails listen and spot checks, is unaware of R.</p><p>F attacks B (full-attack)</p><p>B attacks F (full-attack)</p><p></p><p>round 10:</p><p>R attacks F (full-attack) and becomes visible on first attack. </p><p></p><p>Now, is F considered flat-footed as he was unaware of his opponent, and thus denied his dex bonus? Or, does he instantly realize that he has an opponent, despite not having his initiative come up?</p><p></p><p>Thanks,</p><p>Dursk</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Dursk Starkfire, post: 1249165, member: 7561"] Camarath, I believe everybody is in agreement that invisibility ends after the first attack, irregardless of whether it is contained within a full-round attack. I think what is being questioned is whether the defender remains flat-footed from being attacked by an invisible opponent. I guess this would bring up the concept of having surprise rounds within rounds of combat. If you consider that the defender is completely unaware of the invisible rogue, then combat could be technically considered to not have begun between the two. The defendent would probably be allowed spot/listen checks to see if he notices the invisible rogue before being attacked, and if he is unaware, the rogue should get a "surprise" round in the midst of combat. The problem with this is that it gets very difficult to administer multiple initiatives for multiple characters, and how to you judicate a surprise round in the midst of combat? Does the rogue get penalized with a standard action despite other combatants having a full round action available? Let's take the following scenario: (Rogue init 24, Fighter init 12, Barbarian init 8). The Rogue (R) and Barbarian (B) are on the same side and are hiding out (invisible) in an alley for any inopportunistic travellers in order to relinquish their wealth. surprise round: BR F R does nothing B does nothing F has no clue and walks beside R thinking that round 1: BRF Rogue sneak attacks Fighter at full-attack bonus. R is visible after first attack. Following attacks apply sneak-attack damage as F is flat-footed (due to initiative). Fighter draws weapon and smacks R once. B moves into position and attacks F once. round 2: RF B R realizes he's in trouble, and leaves combat (3 rounds) F attacks B (full-attack) B attacks F (full-attack) round 5: F R B R drinks potion of invisibility and returns to combat (4 rounds) round 9: FR B R is not smart enough to flank with B, but moves into position to attack F. F fails listen and spot checks, is unaware of R. F attacks B (full-attack) B attacks F (full-attack) round 10: R attacks F (full-attack) and becomes visible on first attack. Now, is F considered flat-footed as he was unaware of his opponent, and thus denied his dex bonus? Or, does he instantly realize that he has an opponent, despite not having his initiative come up? Thanks, Dursk [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
How many sneak attacks?
Top