Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
How modularization subtly improves the game independent of the rules or participants.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Ainamacar" data-source="post: 5777759" data-attributes="member: 70709"><p>Many potential benefits of modularization are obvious, like the ability to better match our individual preferences to the rules, settings, and people with whom we game. There is another subtle benefit that, to my knowledge, hasn't been discussed yet. Namely, the very process of participating in a modular game is more likely to result in a better gaming experience compared to a non-modular game with exactly the same rules and participants.</p><p></p><p>The argument is quite simple. In a modular game with any given group of people everyone needs to know what modules are actually being used, and this increases the likelihood of discussion or at least awareness about everyone's individual expectations and preferences. In a non-modular game that happens to use precisely the same rules this is less likely to occur. Improved understanding of everyone's campaign expectations from the start can be used to forge firmer consensus about the campaign, will (often) increase mindfulness at the table, and greatly reduces the likelihood that unexpected differences crop up at the table. Those unexpected differences in expectation, especially, can give rise to anything from a small delay to grumbling to outright campaign meltdown.</p><p></p><p>Shared expectations about the game have always been important to successful play, and intentionally seeking to build it before games isn't exactly new advice. For tables that already do this well modularization may help them do it more easily, or cover small cases otherwise forgotten. For tables that barely do it at all, modularization might make some degree of it necessary.</p><p></p><p>I find it remarkable that a person could hypothetically play their ideal (but non-modular) version of D&D, yet be more likely to have a better experience if those same rules came from a modular version of the game. What an irony it would be to insist on one-true-wayism for game rules if this were true.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Ainamacar, post: 5777759, member: 70709"] Many potential benefits of modularization are obvious, like the ability to better match our individual preferences to the rules, settings, and people with whom we game. There is another subtle benefit that, to my knowledge, hasn't been discussed yet. Namely, the very process of participating in a modular game is more likely to result in a better gaming experience compared to a non-modular game with exactly the same rules and participants. The argument is quite simple. In a modular game with any given group of people everyone needs to know what modules are actually being used, and this increases the likelihood of discussion or at least awareness about everyone's individual expectations and preferences. In a non-modular game that happens to use precisely the same rules this is less likely to occur. Improved understanding of everyone's campaign expectations from the start can be used to forge firmer consensus about the campaign, will (often) increase mindfulness at the table, and greatly reduces the likelihood that unexpected differences crop up at the table. Those unexpected differences in expectation, especially, can give rise to anything from a small delay to grumbling to outright campaign meltdown. Shared expectations about the game have always been important to successful play, and intentionally seeking to build it before games isn't exactly new advice. For tables that already do this well modularization may help them do it more easily, or cover small cases otherwise forgotten. For tables that barely do it at all, modularization might make some degree of it necessary. I find it remarkable that a person could hypothetically play their ideal (but non-modular) version of D&D, yet be more likely to have a better experience if those same rules came from a modular version of the game. What an irony it would be to insist on one-true-wayism for game rules if this were true. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
How modularization subtly improves the game independent of the rules or participants.
Top