Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="prosfilaes" data-source="post: 5677806" data-attributes="member: 40166">Sure, if they do. It depends a lot on their perceptions of the two parties and what happened (and the perceptions more than the reality.)Yes. Though personally, while I don't find poison and similar suggestions unrealistic, I do find them unfun. I would drop a series of warnings that Stuff Was Going to Happen and then drop the big avenging heroes in; or alternately a series of NPCs looking for the reward on the spellsage/party's head. ("I heard about what you did to that paladin. That was cool! You know what's even more cool? The 10,000 GP bounty on your head. *Sneak attack*.)** (Actually, more realistically, I'd drop this game or have never started it.)I don't do 4e, so I don't think that way. But my 5th level mage can take out a crowd of low-level NPCs with Fireball, and pretty much ignore any level-1 warrior attack. At 10th level, 3e characters are truly dangerous opponents to 1st level Commoners and Warriors. It changes a lot on the particular game rules and how the DM handles NPC levels, but in 3e, unless a lot of people are walking around with a lot of levels, mid-level PCs should be avoided.</blockquote>