Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="clearstream" data-source="post: 8993456" data-attributes="member: 71699">PHB 5 and 6 explain the cadence of the D&D conversation.This concern seems to rest on an assumption that players ought to have a formal say, i.e. that DM-decides is no good. A group may be satisfied with DM-decides. They wouldn't find reading the rules a weird experience. FKR advocates especially value participant decisions over written rules.I absolutely appreciate concerns about DM-decides, but there seems to me no objective criticism to make of a work that says "this is how I function" on the grounds that it functions that way.</blockquote>