Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
How much control do DMs need?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Umbran" data-source="post: 8997360" data-attributes="member: 177"><p>So, let us look at that a bit.</p><p></p><p>You ask folks to "actually read the rules" - we will set aside the possible condescension of that suggestion for the moment - "and you will see they are not the same thing."</p><p></p><p>Well, of course they aren't <em>exactly</em> the same thing. That's trivial. But we then get to how <em>meaningful</em> the differences are, and upon which differences your argument rests and what you are asserting about those differences.</p><p></p><p>So, if you are saying, "X and Y are different in <this specific way>, and that is terribly meaningful and it means <specific thing about play>..." and folks disagree with your assessment, you will get pushback. Those asserted meanings often look a lot like gatekeeping, asserting a right and a wrong way to play - which is typically coincidentally aligned to the speaker's own preferences.</p><p></p><p>To which the collected answer is usually of the form, "For crying out loud, stop telling people how to have their own fun already!</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Well, yes, that'll happen when you try to nail people down to defining it as one single thing, when... it isn't one single thing in application.</p><p></p><p>D&D is a set of rules that can be applied to play an RPG. Those rules are not explicitly proscriptive about what kind of game it can be, or what the goals or style of play will be. As a practical matter we can allow that those rules are better at supporting some styles than others. But, folks have a good time using them over a wide range of playstyles. </p><p></p><p>Right now, I'm playing in one game that's very dungeon-crawley, combat-on-a-map every session, where most problems are solved by deadly force of arms, and a few are solved by the party Paladin rolling a natural 20 on a persuasion check, much to the party bard's chagrin.</p><p></p><p>Meanwhile, in a game I am running, the party is almost level 4, and the only things they have killed are two goblins and a gelatinous cube.</p><p></p><p>Both are very obviously D&D to anyone observing. But they aren't really the same either. Players are having a fine time in both.</p><p></p><p>Do not confuse "ineffable" with "flexible".</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Umbran, post: 8997360, member: 177"] So, let us look at that a bit. You ask folks to "actually read the rules" - we will set aside the possible condescension of that suggestion for the moment - "and you will see they are not the same thing." Well, of course they aren't [I]exactly[/I] the same thing. That's trivial. But we then get to how [I]meaningful[/I] the differences are, and upon which differences your argument rests and what you are asserting about those differences. So, if you are saying, "X and Y are different in <this specific way>, and that is terribly meaningful and it means <specific thing about play>..." and folks disagree with your assessment, you will get pushback. Those asserted meanings often look a lot like gatekeeping, asserting a right and a wrong way to play - which is typically coincidentally aligned to the speaker's own preferences. To which the collected answer is usually of the form, "For crying out loud, stop telling people how to have their own fun already! Well, yes, that'll happen when you try to nail people down to defining it as one single thing, when... it isn't one single thing in application. D&D is a set of rules that can be applied to play an RPG. Those rules are not explicitly proscriptive about what kind of game it can be, or what the goals or style of play will be. As a practical matter we can allow that those rules are better at supporting some styles than others. But, folks have a good time using them over a wide range of playstyles. Right now, I'm playing in one game that's very dungeon-crawley, combat-on-a-map every session, where most problems are solved by deadly force of arms, and a few are solved by the party Paladin rolling a natural 20 on a persuasion check, much to the party bard's chagrin. Meanwhile, in a game I am running, the party is almost level 4, and the only things they have killed are two goblins and a gelatinous cube. Both are very obviously D&D to anyone observing. But they aren't really the same either. Players are having a fine time in both. Do not confuse "ineffable" with "flexible". [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
How much control do DMs need?
Top