Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Zardnaar" data-source="post: 9635334" data-attributes="member: 6716779">2E sakes were fine. Profit was the problem. By that I mean strong initial sales followed by slow decline. Fails to hit heights of previous edition. &nbsp;3.0 strong initial sales spike then reduction, 4E similar to 3.0 even faster collapse. 3.5 don't think that did very well to begin with (better than 3.0 year 3 though). &nbsp;Don't think it's going to pull either of those scenarios. If sales pop next year it's a 3.0 though. &nbsp; Could be completely wrong but that's my expectation.&nbsp;Somewhat relevant context player asked how long I expect 5.5 to last. I said longer than 3 years, less than 10. He just bought the new books (came in late 5.0 barely used). &nbsp; Also said worst case scenario it tanks we can keep playing or do a 5.25 hybrid. &nbsp;He'll might dust of Pathfinder 1 if required. Barely played it. Mostly used as errata for 3 5.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Zardnaar, post: 9635334, member: 6716779"] 2E sakes were fine. Profit was the problem. By that I mean strong initial sales followed by slow decline. Fails to hit heights of previous edition. 3.0 strong initial sales spike then reduction, 4E similar to 3.0 even faster collapse. 3.5 don't think that did very well to begin with (better than 3.0 year 3 though). Don't think it's going to pull either of those scenarios. If sales pop next year it's a 3.0 though. Could be completely wrong but that's my expectation. Somewhat relevant context player asked how long I expect 5.5 to last. I said longer than 3 years, less than 10. He just bought the new books (came in late 5.0 barely used). Also said worst case scenario it tanks we can keep playing or do a 5.25 hybrid. He'll might dust of Pathfinder 1 if required. Barely played it. Mostly used as errata for 3 5. [/QUOTE]

Verification