Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="CRGreathouse" data-source="post: 404198" data-attributes="member: 474">Hey, UK! <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f600.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":D" title="Big grin    :D"  data-smilie="8"data-shortname=":D" />In that case, I retract what I said - having not seen the IH, I could only guess at its contents by what you post here!That, alone, is a good thing.  Dragons are underrated, as are a number of other creatures; some are overrated, as well.  What I'm really concerned with is the general CRs and ECLs: will the assumptions of the IH with regard to CRs and ECLs be generally the same as the MM/MM2/ELH, with specific exceptions, or notably different?I can't answer this question without knowing more about your book.  Will a creature listed as "CR X" in the IH be comparable in power to a creature listed as "CR X" in the ELH?  What major exceptions, if any, are there in power between ELH/IH creatures of the same CR?This is the kind of statement that makes me worry about the system.  If you claim that CRs past 20 begin to break down, but your system fixes it, will it still be on the same power curve as the ELH and related material?Not really.  I'd be deprived of *the* book for immortal play!  I liked D&Dg (mostly for the pictures <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink    ;)"  data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" />), but the IH should be much better from what I've seen.I think we've nearly cleared these up.  Good luck, in any case!</blockquote>

Verification