Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
How Much Houseruling Are You Willing To Do?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="CleverNickName" data-source="post: 5934305" data-attributes="member: 50987"><p>"If you don't like it, you can just houserule it."</p><p></p><p>That phrase has become quite popular in this forum since the playtest rules came out...it is practically the default response to nearly every complaint about the new system. It's easy to say "X does not exist in my campaign" when dealing with something modular, like a particular weapon or a prestige class. But the more that X is integrated into the game system, the harder it becomes. For example, saying "THAC0 does not exist in my campaign" means rebuilding the entire combat system from the ground up.</p><p></p><p>Everyone has their own personal tolerance level for houseruling. Some people have no qualms with swinging the Ban Hammer at stuff they don't like, others would rather not have to deal with it at all. Most of us might be willing to make a handful of changes to 5E, but they will eventually reach a point where they will throw their hands up and say "You know what? Forget it! I'll just play <insert name here> instead!" What I would like to know is, how much houseruling are you comfortable with?</p><p></p><p><span style="color: Sienna"><strong><u>None:</u></strong> This is the option for people who don't houserule at all. Voting "None" means "If I don't like it right out of the box, I will probably just play something else." It is very important that the new edition be as close to your ideal as possible.</span></p><p><span style="color: Sienna"></span></p><p><span style="color: Sienna"><strong><u>A Little:</u></strong> This is the option for people who don't mind banning or ignoring a few modular things like spiked chains, wishes, or the monk class, but they shy away from integrated rules mechanics. Voting "A Little" means "I might ban 2 or 3 things, but if I have to do more than that to get the new edition to feel right, I'll just play something else." Your house rules fit on one or two sheets of paper.</span></p><p><span style="color: Sienna"></span></p><p><span style="color: Sienna"><strong><u>Some:</u></strong> This is the option for people who add stuff from elsewhere or create "ban lists" of several modular items, and may change one or two integrated rules mechanics...stuff like level loss, or the way turn undead works...but you try to keep the original game as much as possible. Voting "Some" means "I don't mind houseruling and I'll ban the things I don't like, but if I have to make more than a dozen changes, I'll probably play something else." Your house rules are maybe a dozen pages long.</span></p><p><span style="color: Sienna"></span></p><p><span style="color: Sienna"><strong><u>A Lot:</u></strong> This is the option for people who add and remove lots of modular elements to their game, and make several changes to the integrated stuff as well. You play a heavily-modified version of the game, and it includes several changes to integrated rules mechanics...you have a magic point system and you use DR for armor, for example. Voting "A Lot" means "I am very comfortable with houseruling, and I'll write my own version of the new edition if I have to." Your house rules are several dozen pages long.</span></p><p><span style="color: Sienna"></span></p><p><span style="color: Sienna"><strong><u>Complete:</u></strong> This is the option for people who houserule the game so completely that it is almost a different game. Voting "Complete" means "The game I play isn't sold in stores. I don't care all that much about the content of the new edition, because I'm just going to cherry-pick it for ideas anyway." You don't have houserules; you have a custom rules handbook/SRD.</span></p><p></p><p>-----</p><p></p><p>Me? I voted "Some." I don't mind making adjustments to D&D Next, to get the style of game that I want. But if I have to ban or modify more than, say, 10 things? No thanks. I'll just play my custom 3.5E game instead: it only has 8 house rules.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="CleverNickName, post: 5934305, member: 50987"] "If you don't like it, you can just houserule it." That phrase has become quite popular in this forum since the playtest rules came out...it is practically the default response to nearly every complaint about the new system. It's easy to say "X does not exist in my campaign" when dealing with something modular, like a particular weapon or a prestige class. But the more that X is integrated into the game system, the harder it becomes. For example, saying "THAC0 does not exist in my campaign" means rebuilding the entire combat system from the ground up. Everyone has their own personal tolerance level for houseruling. Some people have no qualms with swinging the Ban Hammer at stuff they don't like, others would rather not have to deal with it at all. Most of us might be willing to make a handful of changes to 5E, but they will eventually reach a point where they will throw their hands up and say "You know what? Forget it! I'll just play <insert name here> instead!" What I would like to know is, how much houseruling are you comfortable with? [COLOR="Sienna"][B][U]None:[/U][/B] This is the option for people who don't houserule at all. Voting "None" means "If I don't like it right out of the box, I will probably just play something else." It is very important that the new edition be as close to your ideal as possible. [B][U]A Little:[/U][/B] This is the option for people who don't mind banning or ignoring a few modular things like spiked chains, wishes, or the monk class, but they shy away from integrated rules mechanics. Voting "A Little" means "I might ban 2 or 3 things, but if I have to do more than that to get the new edition to feel right, I'll just play something else." Your house rules fit on one or two sheets of paper. [B][U]Some:[/U][/B] This is the option for people who add stuff from elsewhere or create "ban lists" of several modular items, and may change one or two integrated rules mechanics...stuff like level loss, or the way turn undead works...but you try to keep the original game as much as possible. Voting "Some" means "I don't mind houseruling and I'll ban the things I don't like, but if I have to make more than a dozen changes, I'll probably play something else." Your house rules are maybe a dozen pages long. [B][U]A Lot:[/U][/B] This is the option for people who add and remove lots of modular elements to their game, and make several changes to the integrated stuff as well. You play a heavily-modified version of the game, and it includes several changes to integrated rules mechanics...you have a magic point system and you use DR for armor, for example. Voting "A Lot" means "I am very comfortable with houseruling, and I'll write my own version of the new edition if I have to." Your house rules are several dozen pages long. [B][U]Complete:[/U][/B] This is the option for people who houserule the game so completely that it is almost a different game. Voting "Complete" means "The game I play isn't sold in stores. I don't care all that much about the content of the new edition, because I'm just going to cherry-pick it for ideas anyway." You don't have houserules; you have a custom rules handbook/SRD.[/COLOR] ----- Me? I voted "Some." I don't mind making adjustments to D&D Next, to get the style of game that I want. But if I have to ban or modify more than, say, 10 things? No thanks. I'll just play my custom 3.5E game instead: it only has 8 house rules. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
How Much Houseruling Are You Willing To Do?
Top