Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
How much of the rules can the players process?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Frostmarrow" data-source="post: 5837077" data-attributes="member: 1122"><p>I was reading along at my own pace, hopping from one thread to the next when I saw another instance of someone pointing out that modular rules will cost adventure pages. It dawned on me that in order for modularity to work the DM must be left without the burden of various modular rules. Also, if D&DN is going to be compatible with older material the DM still must be free from having to convert everything on the fly.</p><p></p><p>What if game rules are for the players only and that the DM is all about words and common language? The players can calculate odds, roll dice and determine whether they are successful or not without needing a DM. The only thing a DM can do, rules-wise, is set DCs anyway. So if the DC is always set by the rules instead of the DM the players can mind themselves. The DM on the other hand is only interested in one thing: is an attempt successful or not?</p><p></p><p>Without rules role-playing works just fine. But without rules it's not a game. So we need some rules to make it a game. However, the DM needs no rules – he's got players.</p><p></p><p>The players need rules. A player wants to do something with his character. But he needs to back it up with something to convince the DM to let him have his way. A successful check is a good argument. Sacrificing resources is another good argument. So when a player says "I seduce the princess" the DM can ask what he's got going for him and the player can reply fancy clothes and a successful charisma check. (Which is better than rags and a failed charisma check).</p><p></p><p>This is harder to explain than I thought. Take combat for instance. A DM can say an ogre attacks you, and that is all the DM needs to know. You as a player need to know the odds of hitting and how hard a hit is. After you have rolled to hit and damage and crossreference the amount of damage on a chart you find that the strike is "enough to fell a charging ox". You tell the DM and he replies that "well, with such a hit the ogre is slain".</p><p></p><p>Help me out. How much of the rules can the players process? What is the minimum amount of rules the GM must know?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Frostmarrow, post: 5837077, member: 1122"] I was reading along at my own pace, hopping from one thread to the next when I saw another instance of someone pointing out that modular rules will cost adventure pages. It dawned on me that in order for modularity to work the DM must be left without the burden of various modular rules. Also, if D&DN is going to be compatible with older material the DM still must be free from having to convert everything on the fly. What if game rules are for the players only and that the DM is all about words and common language? The players can calculate odds, roll dice and determine whether they are successful or not without needing a DM. The only thing a DM can do, rules-wise, is set DCs anyway. So if the DC is always set by the rules instead of the DM the players can mind themselves. The DM on the other hand is only interested in one thing: is an attempt successful or not? Without rules role-playing works just fine. But without rules it's not a game. So we need some rules to make it a game. However, the DM needs no rules – he's got players. The players need rules. A player wants to do something with his character. But he needs to back it up with something to convince the DM to let him have his way. A successful check is a good argument. Sacrificing resources is another good argument. So when a player says "I seduce the princess" the DM can ask what he's got going for him and the player can reply fancy clothes and a successful charisma check. (Which is better than rags and a failed charisma check). This is harder to explain than I thought. Take combat for instance. A DM can say an ogre attacks you, and that is all the DM needs to know. You as a player need to know the odds of hitting and how hard a hit is. After you have rolled to hit and damage and crossreference the amount of damage on a chart you find that the strike is "enough to fell a charging ox". You tell the DM and he replies that "well, with such a hit the ogre is slain". Help me out. How much of the rules can the players process? What is the minimum amount of rules the GM must know? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
How much of the rules can the players process?
Top