Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Enchanted Trinkets Complete--a hardcover book containing over 500 magic items for your D&D games!

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Rel" data-source="post: 2143079" data-attributes="member: 99">I must reiterate that I don't consider these similarites as striking as you do.  Consider:RM does NOT give a certain number of Development Points based on the "class" (or "profession" as it is called in RM) of the character.  Your DP are determined by your stats.There is no such thing as a specifically defined "Non-Class Skill" in RM.  You might pay 1DP for a skill that is strongly associated with your profession, 5DP for one that is loosely associated with your profession and 20DP for one that is largely foreign to someone of your profession.  This is further limited by how many ranks of a skill that you can purchase at each level.  Some skills that are strongly associated with your profession allow you to purchase up to three ranks each level and some are limited to a single rank.  This is a far cry from D&D's "1 point for Class Skills, 2 for Cross-Class, buy as many as you can afford" mechanic.There is no such thing as a "DC" in RM though there are set thresholds for various set difficulty levels.  In some ways this is less flexible than D&D where you can say "The DC is 19".  In RM the difficulty would be something like "a Medium maneuver" that requires rolling a 111 or better with the next threshold being a Hard Maneuver requiring a roll of 121 (i.e. a 10% granularity rather than a 5% granularity).RM and MERP also both have a maneuver table to track how far along you are on a maneuver that could require multiple rolls.  So you might accomplish 10% of your maneuver on the first roll, 40% on the second roll and 50% on the third roll.  There is nothing similar to this in D&D.RMSS incorporated individual "Maneuver Tables" for most skills that gave results for critical success and critical failures as well as "unusual results" (on a roll of 66) in addition to the typical thresholds for "Failure", "Partial Success", "Success", etc.  D&D has no such concepts except those added by the GM via house rule.Also, many things that D&D incorporates as "Class Features" are included in the skills section of RM.  Things like Hit Points (which are a fixed amount per rank and based on your race), spells, increases in general weapon skills, martial arts maneuvers, "Adrenal" skills, special weapons maneuvers and so forth are all incorporated as skills.Suffice it to say that I think the differences are large and significant.  I only make this as an observation based on my experience with both systems and not as a value judgement.  While I gave up RM (in part due to getting tired with the many, many charts one had to consult for simple things like a dagger thrust) for 3E, I had a great many years of fun with it.  That is not diminished by the fact that I moved on to something else.Nor do any minor similarities with RM lessen my enjoyment of D&D.It does rather sadden me that some in the roleplaying community seem to have a rather large chip on their shoulder about the issue though (I'm not pointing fingers at anybody in this thread).  One reason why I left behind the RM online community that I was part of for many years was because of how angry some of them seemed to get whenever the subject of D&D was brought up.  The idea that some mechanics shared by RM were incorporated into D&D was cause for them to make accusations of WOTC being "copycats" or "trying to mimic the superiority of RM" rather than simply acknowledging that these were solid, useful and flexible mechanics that many games could benefit from.</blockquote>

Verification