Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
How much should 5e aim at balance?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Emerikol" data-source="post: 5989267" data-attributes="member: 6698278"><p>I missed or forgot you'd made your comment in the context of the story hour. I agree we are fascinated by magic and the magical. Gandalf is by far the most interesting character for me in LOTR and thats in a world where magic is perhaps not as dominant as in D&D.</p><p></p><p></p><p>I'm sure Pathfinder 2e is coming. I expect it will appear a few years after 5e. I doubt Monte will do it. He can make more money as a lone gun.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I like longer runs too. I'd like 10 year runs anyway. I'd also like a game that was more additive than rewrite. I don't mind streamlining and/or tweaks for improved gameplay but I don't want the whole game fundamentally changed.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I like us getting philosophical. It's a lot more interesting than us shooting at each other with the snark guns. </p><p></p><p>The issue I have with saying it's personal preference is this. A lot of people when they read about dissociative mechanics suddenly see why they have the issue. Until then they just felt like the game didn't resonate with them. When they read those words it's like a lightbulb flashing on. Yes thats it! Someone finally put their finger on it. After reading about it they suddenly start seeing various parts of games in different ways. I don't think that this collective understanding is unique to individuals. So there is something that triggers this response in various people the world over who've never met each other. I raised the issue like I said entirely independently before realizing that others had came before me. When I read their stuff I said "They get what I'm saying". </p><p></p><p>I really believe if you put us all in separate rooms and gave us tests we'd give the same answers. A,B,C are dissociative and X,Y,Z are not. So there is some internal mental process where we identify a dissociative mechanic. No one that I know of who has issues with the mechanic think that hit points are dissociative. It is only those who don't recognize the specifics of dissociative mechanics that try to argue that they are equivalent to martial dailies. Now do I think it may be the way we are wired both nurture and nature? Yes. In some cases thats it. In others I think it is a person's approach to the game in general but I'm not putting that on everyone. </p><p></p><p>Here is how a lot of us feel. It's like watching a black and white movie that has one object in color. We keep pointing out that the one color thing is distracting. A color blind person keeps saying it's all black and white. That the thing I'm saying is a particular color is in fact the same color as this thing over here that I in fact see as black. So if you can imagine this happening now you know my frustration.</p><p></p><p>I would hope we could get to the point where people could just say - hey I don't have a problem with dissociative mechanics. I realize you do and where possible if it makes not a bit of difference lets go without them. Where it does lets modularize. But when people keep denying their existence as if by denial all those thousands of people who do think they exist will suddenly just close their eyes and agree. They aren't going to do that. It bothers them so it matters TO THEM. (for emphasis I don't mean to yell here).</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Emerikol, post: 5989267, member: 6698278"] I missed or forgot you'd made your comment in the context of the story hour. I agree we are fascinated by magic and the magical. Gandalf is by far the most interesting character for me in LOTR and thats in a world where magic is perhaps not as dominant as in D&D. I'm sure Pathfinder 2e is coming. I expect it will appear a few years after 5e. I doubt Monte will do it. He can make more money as a lone gun. I like longer runs too. I'd like 10 year runs anyway. I'd also like a game that was more additive than rewrite. I don't mind streamlining and/or tweaks for improved gameplay but I don't want the whole game fundamentally changed. I like us getting philosophical. It's a lot more interesting than us shooting at each other with the snark guns. The issue I have with saying it's personal preference is this. A lot of people when they read about dissociative mechanics suddenly see why they have the issue. Until then they just felt like the game didn't resonate with them. When they read those words it's like a lightbulb flashing on. Yes thats it! Someone finally put their finger on it. After reading about it they suddenly start seeing various parts of games in different ways. I don't think that this collective understanding is unique to individuals. So there is something that triggers this response in various people the world over who've never met each other. I raised the issue like I said entirely independently before realizing that others had came before me. When I read their stuff I said "They get what I'm saying". I really believe if you put us all in separate rooms and gave us tests we'd give the same answers. A,B,C are dissociative and X,Y,Z are not. So there is some internal mental process where we identify a dissociative mechanic. No one that I know of who has issues with the mechanic think that hit points are dissociative. It is only those who don't recognize the specifics of dissociative mechanics that try to argue that they are equivalent to martial dailies. Now do I think it may be the way we are wired both nurture and nature? Yes. In some cases thats it. In others I think it is a person's approach to the game in general but I'm not putting that on everyone. Here is how a lot of us feel. It's like watching a black and white movie that has one object in color. We keep pointing out that the one color thing is distracting. A color blind person keeps saying it's all black and white. That the thing I'm saying is a particular color is in fact the same color as this thing over here that I in fact see as black. So if you can imagine this happening now you know my frustration. I would hope we could get to the point where people could just say - hey I don't have a problem with dissociative mechanics. I realize you do and where possible if it makes not a bit of difference lets go without them. Where it does lets modularize. But when people keep denying their existence as if by denial all those thousands of people who do think they exist will suddenly just close their eyes and agree. They aren't going to do that. It bothers them so it matters TO THEM. (for emphasis I don't mean to yell here). [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
How much should 5e aim at balance?
Top