Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
How much should players be expected to actively contribute to the group's dynamics?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="innerdude" data-source="post: 5450766" data-attributes="member: 85870"><p>Well, I can't say as I'm surprised, but I just got off the phone with one of my players. The gist of the conversation: "I'm just not getting much out of the game right now." </p><p></p><p>To put some of this into perspective: This player has been a part of my same general gaming group for close to 6 years. He and I were both players under a different GM for three or four years, but when the old GM sort of fell off the deep end we started getting our own group together. I could sort of see this coming, and I don't think I can totally disagree with him on his assessment. </p><p></p><p>Two of the better players in our current Pathfinder group have been completely MIA since the first week of December. Prior to that, they were generally there for at least 2 out of every 3 sessions, usually more. But since then, they've been just.....gone. </p><p></p><p>As a result, the other three players (besides my friend Jared) consist of my wife, my wife's sister, and the sister's boyfriend. </p><p></p><p>As much as a I love my wife, she roleplays with us because she knows I enjoy it--not because she has a particular passion for it. She enjoys the aspects of playing the game, and with the right coaching her characters are always effective, but she never really makes any decisions for the group collectively. Her characters have no agenda, they're just <em>there</em>. The sister is a little better; she at least puts some personality in her characters--but not much else. Her idea of a character concept rarely goes much beyond some superficial mechanical or personality aspect that she essentially pushes the "repeat" button on throughout the sessions. </p><p></p><p>And the boyfriend supposedly is an experienced WoD player, but I have yet to see in two months of play where that experience has manifest itself at the table. </p><p></p><p>None of the three of them ever do anything unexpected, nor rise to any sort of interaction at the table beyond "mildly amusing" or "semi-interesting." And my friend Jared feels like he's pulling dead weight to get things to happen. They're the epitome of "Smells Like Teen Spirit": Here we are now, entertain us!</p><p></p><p>And now I'm left wondering: How much can/should/do I realistically expect a player to bring to the table to add to the group's fun? </p><p></p><p>Some GM's would probably say, "If they want to be there, can manage to shower 3 times a week, and are literate enough to work their character, they should have a place in a group." But if that's really all a player is bringing, are they doing enough? </p><p></p><p>When I'm on the other side of the aisle as a player, I'm constantly looking for ways to keep game interaction going. I talk to NPCs. I want to explore surroundings. I generally play a character with motivations, because I assume the GM is creating a world consistent with that outlook. I'm not saying every player has to be hardcore into it. But I'm beginning to think that every group <em>needs </em>a player who shows up and tries to be a little bit more than a pawn for the encounters. Someone who wants to interact with the milieu of the world. </p><p></p><p>And say what you will about power gamers--but their motivations are transparent, and they're generally easy to please, and they're certainly proactive. In that regard I'd rather have a table of raging power gamers than a table of passive dice-rollers. </p><p></p><p>But as C.S. Lewis once said comparing a whore to a self-righteous prig, "Of course it is better to be neither." </p><p></p><p>At this point I feel about roleplaying the same way I do about volleyball. When I discovered what "real" volleyball was like--meaning players knew how to play, were skilled at it, and understood the game--I could never go back to playing "hack" volleyball. It bored me. </p><p></p><p>And now I'm the same way with my RPG experiences. I'd rather not play at all than to play at a sub-par level.</p><p></p><p>So do we abandon the group and start over? Go our separate ways and say it was fun while it lasted? Should I talk to the players about it? And is it unreasonable to expect players to bring something other than their dice and a smile when they sit down to play?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="innerdude, post: 5450766, member: 85870"] Well, I can't say as I'm surprised, but I just got off the phone with one of my players. The gist of the conversation: "I'm just not getting much out of the game right now." To put some of this into perspective: This player has been a part of my same general gaming group for close to 6 years. He and I were both players under a different GM for three or four years, but when the old GM sort of fell off the deep end we started getting our own group together. I could sort of see this coming, and I don't think I can totally disagree with him on his assessment. Two of the better players in our current Pathfinder group have been completely MIA since the first week of December. Prior to that, they were generally there for at least 2 out of every 3 sessions, usually more. But since then, they've been just.....gone. As a result, the other three players (besides my friend Jared) consist of my wife, my wife's sister, and the sister's boyfriend. As much as a I love my wife, she roleplays with us because she knows I enjoy it--not because she has a particular passion for it. She enjoys the aspects of playing the game, and with the right coaching her characters are always effective, but she never really makes any decisions for the group collectively. Her characters have no agenda, they're just [I]there[/I]. The sister is a little better; she at least puts some personality in her characters--but not much else. Her idea of a character concept rarely goes much beyond some superficial mechanical or personality aspect that she essentially pushes the "repeat" button on throughout the sessions. And the boyfriend supposedly is an experienced WoD player, but I have yet to see in two months of play where that experience has manifest itself at the table. None of the three of them ever do anything unexpected, nor rise to any sort of interaction at the table beyond "mildly amusing" or "semi-interesting." And my friend Jared feels like he's pulling dead weight to get things to happen. They're the epitome of "Smells Like Teen Spirit": Here we are now, entertain us! And now I'm left wondering: How much can/should/do I realistically expect a player to bring to the table to add to the group's fun? Some GM's would probably say, "If they want to be there, can manage to shower 3 times a week, and are literate enough to work their character, they should have a place in a group." But if that's really all a player is bringing, are they doing enough? When I'm on the other side of the aisle as a player, I'm constantly looking for ways to keep game interaction going. I talk to NPCs. I want to explore surroundings. I generally play a character with motivations, because I assume the GM is creating a world consistent with that outlook. I'm not saying every player has to be hardcore into it. But I'm beginning to think that every group [I]needs [/I]a player who shows up and tries to be a little bit more than a pawn for the encounters. Someone who wants to interact with the milieu of the world. And say what you will about power gamers--but their motivations are transparent, and they're generally easy to please, and they're certainly proactive. In that regard I'd rather have a table of raging power gamers than a table of passive dice-rollers. But as C.S. Lewis once said comparing a whore to a self-righteous prig, "Of course it is better to be neither." At this point I feel about roleplaying the same way I do about volleyball. When I discovered what "real" volleyball was like--meaning players knew how to play, were skilled at it, and understood the game--I could never go back to playing "hack" volleyball. It bored me. And now I'm the same way with my RPG experiences. I'd rather not play at all than to play at a sub-par level. So do we abandon the group and start over? Go our separate ways and say it was fun while it lasted? Should I talk to the players about it? And is it unreasonable to expect players to bring something other than their dice and a smile when they sit down to play? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
How much should players be expected to actively contribute to the group's dynamics?
Top