Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="AaronOfBarbaria" data-source="post: 7043611" data-attributes="member: 6701872">It is not necessarily true that what were core classes in prior editions will be best fit into a new edition as core classes.After all, the Illusionist class got moved from it's own class to being a sub-class, and that worked out just fine, right?Where as my perception has things looking much more like"I need a new camaro to replace my old one. It's worn out from my long commute.""There's a minivan in decent condition for sale over there.""No, it's gotta be a camaro.""That's kind of arbitrary. Isn't the point to have a vehicle that gets you from A to B?"You've lost me. How am I showing temerity? What am I asking for?Only under the condition of refusing to count anything short of a full class as a genuine attempt at officially supporting warlord characters. That, being an arbitrary restriction, is not one under which I will discuss things.Fixed this bit for you. Now it's what I actually said, rather than some fiction you made up.You appear to have me confused for someone else.I think its as satisfied as it is going to get, considering the only further source of satisfaction.</blockquote>