Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
How new Wizards of the Coast head John Hight turned around World of Warcraft
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Ruin Explorer" data-source="post: 9434765" data-attributes="member: 18"><p>That is possible.</p><p></p><p>I would, based on what Crawford and particularly Perkins have said, think that it's unlikely this was something they were told to do from above, but I can't rule it out. What probably did come from above was the sudden change in timeline, where they were saying "Oh yeah we're going to iterate a bunch" and then later "Yeah will give you bits of the DMG and MM to test", and then neither of those things really happened. But we know where the whole 70%-feedback-loop deal came from and that was Mike Mearls, and it was chosen specifically because Mearls wanted to get lapsed players back in and to keep them. I suspect were he still in charge he might have taken a different approach to 2024, and that Crawford/Perkins retained it because they didn't really know what else to do.</p><p></p><p></p><p>That's not the impression I've got from the actual 5E setting books. Like, VRGTR for example, the setting info is just rushed. It doesn't feel "slim and useful" to me, as much as "Holy hell we've got to cover a lot because we're only ever getting one book, so every single nation has to be covered, which means it's going to be real light for all of them because of the page count!".</p><p></p><p></p><p>The "somehow" is because it absolutely did happen in 2E, 3E, 4E, and with Eberron, 5E. That's er... quite a lot of decades and again Eberron shows it isn't an impossibility in 5E. I don't think anyone actually expects everything from every book, or even most things from most books to be covered - I've never seen that opinion from an actual poster, rather than attributed to nebulous "people" who don't actually exist. What people have expressed a desire for is books more similar to 2E/3E/5E Eberron in terms of the amount of setting info.</p><p></p><p>Also, I'd say it's worth noting that 5E Eberron probably supports a new DM coming to the setting rather better than say, 5E Planescape, or 5E Ravenloft.</p><p></p><p>I do think one of the problems is that WotC are doing "one book and done" for settings that were never intended to operate that way. Especially as WotC has reduced the page counts compared to earlier releases, and insisted on including increasingly large adventures and bestiaries in the setting books (despite increasing the price by far more than inflation).</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Ruin Explorer, post: 9434765, member: 18"] That is possible. I would, based on what Crawford and particularly Perkins have said, think that it's unlikely this was something they were told to do from above, but I can't rule it out. What probably did come from above was the sudden change in timeline, where they were saying "Oh yeah we're going to iterate a bunch" and then later "Yeah will give you bits of the DMG and MM to test", and then neither of those things really happened. But we know where the whole 70%-feedback-loop deal came from and that was Mike Mearls, and it was chosen specifically because Mearls wanted to get lapsed players back in and to keep them. I suspect were he still in charge he might have taken a different approach to 2024, and that Crawford/Perkins retained it because they didn't really know what else to do. That's not the impression I've got from the actual 5E setting books. Like, VRGTR for example, the setting info is just rushed. It doesn't feel "slim and useful" to me, as much as "Holy hell we've got to cover a lot because we're only ever getting one book, so every single nation has to be covered, which means it's going to be real light for all of them because of the page count!". The "somehow" is because it absolutely did happen in 2E, 3E, 4E, and with Eberron, 5E. That's er... quite a lot of decades and again Eberron shows it isn't an impossibility in 5E. I don't think anyone actually expects everything from every book, or even most things from most books to be covered - I've never seen that opinion from an actual poster, rather than attributed to nebulous "people" who don't actually exist. What people have expressed a desire for is books more similar to 2E/3E/5E Eberron in terms of the amount of setting info. Also, I'd say it's worth noting that 5E Eberron probably supports a new DM coming to the setting rather better than say, 5E Planescape, or 5E Ravenloft. I do think one of the problems is that WotC are doing "one book and done" for settings that were never intended to operate that way. Especially as WotC has reduced the page counts compared to earlier releases, and insisted on including increasingly large adventures and bestiaries in the setting books (despite increasing the price by far more than inflation). [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
How new Wizards of the Coast head John Hight turned around World of Warcraft
Top