Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
How new Wizards of the Coast head John Hight turned around World of Warcraft
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="WisdomOfWombats" data-source="post: 9434819" data-attributes="member: 6973514"><p>I do see your points. Eberron was already too light on the setting for my taste, since I still have the original 3E book on my shelf. I can pull more setting information from there than from the 5E book.</p><p></p><p>5e happens in a different publishing environment than 2e and 3e. Most D&D settings have been either invented for 2e or came into their own during that era. Both 2e and 3e had a different publishing policy. It was kind of a treadmill to stay fresh and in the stores. I am not sure if that really means that those settings do require more than a single book/boxed set/slipcase. We got those additional books anyway, and of course discovered uses for them and the sometimes deep lore they contained. 5e is a radical change from that earlier policies. Now, books are rare events with about 5 spread throughout the year with a more limited page run than in earlier editions. In case of the Forgotten Realms we so far have only gotten about 1/3 of a setting (if you are generous). The Sea of Fallen Stars area is sorely missing, as are all the southern Realms.</p><p></p><p>With 5e Planescape and Spelljammer, WotC changed the presentation from a single book to three slim books. Spelljammer was definitely too slim, and is missing some vital rules for building your own star systems.</p><p></p><p>Personally, I don‘t care for the included adventures. That space could be better used for setting descriptions. But I do like the bestiaries.</p><p></p><p>The slipcases and DM screens of course increase the price point. I am not sure how I feel about that.</p><p></p><p>Maybe doing a setting book with an integrated bestiary and then an campaign book or adventure collection as a separate book would be better. But would deviate from the „stand-alone“ model of the books. I for one would have liked a DL book and then a campaign instead of getting thread-bare setting information and a so-so campaign. Also I would have bundled the miniature skirmish game with a Birthright release not a Dragonlance one.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="WisdomOfWombats, post: 9434819, member: 6973514"] I do see your points. Eberron was already too light on the setting for my taste, since I still have the original 3E book on my shelf. I can pull more setting information from there than from the 5E book. 5e happens in a different publishing environment than 2e and 3e. Most D&D settings have been either invented for 2e or came into their own during that era. Both 2e and 3e had a different publishing policy. It was kind of a treadmill to stay fresh and in the stores. I am not sure if that really means that those settings do require more than a single book/boxed set/slipcase. We got those additional books anyway, and of course discovered uses for them and the sometimes deep lore they contained. 5e is a radical change from that earlier policies. Now, books are rare events with about 5 spread throughout the year with a more limited page run than in earlier editions. In case of the Forgotten Realms we so far have only gotten about 1/3 of a setting (if you are generous). The Sea of Fallen Stars area is sorely missing, as are all the southern Realms. With 5e Planescape and Spelljammer, WotC changed the presentation from a single book to three slim books. Spelljammer was definitely too slim, and is missing some vital rules for building your own star systems. Personally, I don‘t care for the included adventures. That space could be better used for setting descriptions. But I do like the bestiaries. The slipcases and DM screens of course increase the price point. I am not sure how I feel about that. Maybe doing a setting book with an integrated bestiary and then an campaign book or adventure collection as a separate book would be better. But would deviate from the „stand-alone“ model of the books. I for one would have liked a DL book and then a campaign instead of getting thread-bare setting information and a so-so campaign. Also I would have bundled the miniature skirmish game with a Birthright release not a Dragonlance one. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
How new Wizards of the Coast head John Hight turned around World of Warcraft
Top