Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
How odds make you feel
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Frostmarrow" data-source="post: 5879858" data-attributes="member: 1122"><p>Traditionally in D&D your odds of success depends on your character's experience. A high level character is more likely to succeed at any given task than a low level one.</p><p></p><p>I wonder if the odds of success could be based on what you like to convey emotionally?</p><p></p><p>Let's look at some odds of success:</p><p></p><p>5% chance. This is a long shot. The player knows this is a sacrifice and that he will most likely fail. However, sometimes it works and the whole table cheers.</p><p></p><p>30% chance. A hard check. This makes the player feel like an nincompoop or a fish out of water.</p><p></p><p>50% chance. This is a coin toss. The player feels like he's not in control of the situation.</p><p></p><p>70% chance. The player feels in control and is confident to succeed, but not overly so.</p><p></p><p>90% chance. The player is sure of success and somewhat arrogant. Failure here is a huge disappointment.</p><p></p><p>The point is maybe the game should put focus on this aspect of die rolls rather than the progression from 30-90% chance for every character in every area.</p><p></p><p>For instance, spell casting is an area where you want the caster to be arrogantly aware of the power of magic. In D&D this is represented by the fact the spells never fails. Wouldn't it be interesting if spell casting instead had a 95% chance of being cast successfully?</p><p></p><p>Attacking with a sword should be in the area around 70%. Fighting is risky but I'm a skilled swordsman and you can rely on me.</p><p></p><p>Picking pockets is exciting but should not be attempted with high confidence (as it breaks the economy). Pick pocketing should fall in the 50% chance bracket. Turn undead also belongs here. The uncertainty brings suspense.</p><p></p><p>30% chance is good for characters that has to do something out of their area of expertise, such as a fighter trying to bargain with a merchant.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Frostmarrow, post: 5879858, member: 1122"] Traditionally in D&D your odds of success depends on your character's experience. A high level character is more likely to succeed at any given task than a low level one. I wonder if the odds of success could be based on what you like to convey emotionally? Let's look at some odds of success: 5% chance. This is a long shot. The player knows this is a sacrifice and that he will most likely fail. However, sometimes it works and the whole table cheers. 30% chance. A hard check. This makes the player feel like an nincompoop or a fish out of water. 50% chance. This is a coin toss. The player feels like he's not in control of the situation. 70% chance. The player feels in control and is confident to succeed, but not overly so. 90% chance. The player is sure of success and somewhat arrogant. Failure here is a huge disappointment. The point is maybe the game should put focus on this aspect of die rolls rather than the progression from 30-90% chance for every character in every area. For instance, spell casting is an area where you want the caster to be arrogantly aware of the power of magic. In D&D this is represented by the fact the spells never fails. Wouldn't it be interesting if spell casting instead had a 95% chance of being cast successfully? Attacking with a sword should be in the area around 70%. Fighting is risky but I'm a skilled swordsman and you can rely on me. Picking pockets is exciting but should not be attempted with high confidence (as it breaks the economy). Pick pocketing should fall in the 50% chance bracket. Turn undead also belongs here. The uncertainty brings suspense. 30% chance is good for characters that has to do something out of their area of expertise, such as a fighter trying to bargain with a merchant. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
How odds make you feel
Top