Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Oofta" data-source="post: 9547235" data-attributes="member: 6801845">Same old non-answer as expected.&nbsp;&nbsp; <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f644.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":rolleyes:" title="Roll eyes&nbsp; &nbsp; :rolleyes:"&nbsp; data-smilie="11"data-shortname=":rolleyes:" />&nbsp; Sometimes reasonable people disagree.Did I say it was utterly impossible?&nbsp; No.&nbsp; Did I ever say anything about unquestionable authority?&nbsp; No.&nbsp; I'm sure there are many ways of dealing with it.&nbsp; I simply had a question. The DM says &quot;no the rule doesn't work that way&quot;, the player says &quot;yest it does&quot;.&nbsp; What happens.&nbsp; But you are unwilling to answer a simple question.&nbsp; If a DM repeatedly makes decisions I disagree with I could, and have, left the game.Anyone at the table has the right to raise objections. If someone is truly upset or disturbed about another player's actions we'll discuss it and in most make allowances for the person that is not having fun.&nbsp; Without specific details though, I can't make a final call.&nbsp; If the Snarf that is upset that Kim play a bard, I'll discuss it but I'm not going to stop Kim from playing a bard.&nbsp; If Snarf is upset because Kim's bard is using all sorts of foul language, I'll ask Kim to tone it down.As for the rest, the DM makes the final call.&nbsp; Just like the books have advised for half a century.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Oofta, post: 9547235, member: 6801845"] Same old non-answer as expected. :rolleyes: Sometimes reasonable people disagree. Did I say it was utterly impossible? No. Did I ever say anything about unquestionable authority? No. I'm sure there are many ways of dealing with it. I simply had a question. The DM says "no the rule doesn't work that way", the player says "yest it does". What happens. But you are unwilling to answer a simple question. If a DM repeatedly makes decisions I disagree with I could, and have, left the game. Anyone at the table has the right to raise objections. If someone is truly upset or disturbed about another player's actions we'll discuss it and in most make allowances for the person that is not having fun. Without specific details though, I can't make a final call. If the Snarf that is upset that Kim play a bard, I'll discuss it but I'm not going to stop Kim from playing a bard. If Snarf is upset because Kim's bard is using all sorts of foul language, I'll ask Kim to tone it down. As for the rest, the DM makes the final call. Just like the books have advised for half a century. [/QUOTE]

Verification