Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
How Quickly is C&C Catching on?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="bolie" data-source="post: 1982050" data-attributes="member: 8312"><p>No one has said that C&C would do all that 3e would out of the box but a lot of people (here and elsewhere) have said that not having a lot of rules somehow makes it easier to do a lot of different things. Several people have stated in this thread that feats, skills, and prestige classes don't make characters much more different from each other than primes and RP. Or they've stated that not having all those pesky feats and skills means they can use RP to distinguish characters as much or better.</p><p></p><p>I agree that you can do a lot to distinguish characters by RP and primes and equipment. But it boggles my mind that anyone would think that having feats, skills, and prestige classes doesn't help.</p><p></p><p>But then my understanding is that C&C isn't trying to allow for all the customization of characters and monsters, it's allowing for customizing of the game itself. Which is not an inherent flaw. I do not intend that as a criticism.</p><p></p><p>So... my take on C&C v. 3e is that 3e allows for a wider variety of characters and monsters and tactical options in combat but requires a much, MUCH larger investment of time and money and can discourage some people from thinking outside the box because the box is so big. C&C is simple and fast to play. Making characters is quick and relatively simple. The rules are less comprehensive which may encourage some people to be more creative (but which does not inherently allow more creativity).</p><p></p><p>As far as system design goes, I much prefer C&C saves to 3e saves and I much prefer 3e monster design (with stats and monster HD like classes) to C&C monster design. Much of the other stuff that I'm not crazy about in C&C can easily be house ruled (adding feats and/or skills, 5 foot steps, spells, etc...).</p><p></p><p>Oh, and I've tried posting on the Troll Lord games forum, but I keep getting an InvalidDomain error or something. I've used ezboard before with no trouble on other sites, though, so I'm not sure what the problem is. It might be my extreme firewall/proxy stuff or something. It's probably just as well that I haven't been able to post there. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></p><p></p><p>Bolie IV</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="bolie, post: 1982050, member: 8312"] No one has said that C&C would do all that 3e would out of the box but a lot of people (here and elsewhere) have said that not having a lot of rules somehow makes it easier to do a lot of different things. Several people have stated in this thread that feats, skills, and prestige classes don't make characters much more different from each other than primes and RP. Or they've stated that not having all those pesky feats and skills means they can use RP to distinguish characters as much or better. I agree that you can do a lot to distinguish characters by RP and primes and equipment. But it boggles my mind that anyone would think that having feats, skills, and prestige classes doesn't help. But then my understanding is that C&C isn't trying to allow for all the customization of characters and monsters, it's allowing for customizing of the game itself. Which is not an inherent flaw. I do not intend that as a criticism. So... my take on C&C v. 3e is that 3e allows for a wider variety of characters and monsters and tactical options in combat but requires a much, MUCH larger investment of time and money and can discourage some people from thinking outside the box because the box is so big. C&C is simple and fast to play. Making characters is quick and relatively simple. The rules are less comprehensive which may encourage some people to be more creative (but which does not inherently allow more creativity). As far as system design goes, I much prefer C&C saves to 3e saves and I much prefer 3e monster design (with stats and monster HD like classes) to C&C monster design. Much of the other stuff that I'm not crazy about in C&C can easily be house ruled (adding feats and/or skills, 5 foot steps, spells, etc...). Oh, and I've tried posting on the Troll Lord games forum, but I keep getting an InvalidDomain error or something. I've used ezboard before with no trouble on other sites, though, so I'm not sure what the problem is. It might be my extreme firewall/proxy stuff or something. It's probably just as well that I haven't been able to post there. :) Bolie IV [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
How Quickly is C&C Catching on?
Top