Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
How should 5e handle rules problems?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Dannager" data-source="post: 5828477" data-attributes="member: 73683"><p>Your rule books are not made obsolete. They are fully functional. They allow you to play the game. They <em>do not</em> allow you to play the most up-to-date version of the game by themselves. On the other hand, neither do the rules updates allow you to play the most up-to-date version of the game by themselves.</p><p></p><p>Again, it boils down to a fairly simple, two-scenario situation:</p><p></p><p>1) You like rules updates. In this scenario, you think rules updates are good, and you therefore incorporate them into your game using whatever means you feel works best - reliance on the Compendium, post-it notes in your books, or whatever. Everything is groovy.</p><p></p><p>2) You hate rules updates. In this scenario, you think rules updates are bad, and you therefore make no effort to incorporate them into your game. Everyone in your game plays by the original rules. Everything is groovy.</p><p></p><p>The only pseudo-concern arises when you want to use the original rules but your players rely on the Character Builder. I say "pseudo-concern" because it's really only a concern if you object to rules updates on <strong><em>philosophical</em></strong> grounds - that is, you object because you have a strong personal belief that games should remain static - rather than objecting to them because they're too much work. After all, the Character Builder handles the work of incorporating the rules for you. No effort on the DM's part is required.</p><p></p><p>The short of it is that whining that rules updates are a <em><strong>bad thing</strong></em> for the game because they're too much work is silly. If you like rules updates, you can incorporate them. If you don't like rules updates, you don't have to incorporate them. It is no skin off your nose to have rules updates that you won't use published, and the continued insistence that the game not receive regular rules updates only means that those of us who appreciate the updates will be less likely to receive them because WotC might make the mistake of caving to the whiners.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Dannager, post: 5828477, member: 73683"] Your rule books are not made obsolete. They are fully functional. They allow you to play the game. They [I]do not[/I] allow you to play the most up-to-date version of the game by themselves. On the other hand, neither do the rules updates allow you to play the most up-to-date version of the game by themselves. Again, it boils down to a fairly simple, two-scenario situation: 1) You like rules updates. In this scenario, you think rules updates are good, and you therefore incorporate them into your game using whatever means you feel works best - reliance on the Compendium, post-it notes in your books, or whatever. Everything is groovy. 2) You hate rules updates. In this scenario, you think rules updates are bad, and you therefore make no effort to incorporate them into your game. Everyone in your game plays by the original rules. Everything is groovy. The only pseudo-concern arises when you want to use the original rules but your players rely on the Character Builder. I say "pseudo-concern" because it's really only a concern if you object to rules updates on [B][I]philosophical[/I][/B] grounds - that is, you object because you have a strong personal belief that games should remain static - rather than objecting to them because they're too much work. After all, the Character Builder handles the work of incorporating the rules for you. No effort on the DM's part is required. The short of it is that whining that rules updates are a [I][B]bad thing[/B][/I] for the game because they're too much work is silly. If you like rules updates, you can incorporate them. If you don't like rules updates, you don't have to incorporate them. It is no skin off your nose to have rules updates that you won't use published, and the continued insistence that the game not receive regular rules updates only means that those of us who appreciate the updates will be less likely to receive them because WotC might make the mistake of caving to the whiners. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
How should 5e handle rules problems?
Top