Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
How should combat maneuvers be handled in Next?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Remathilis" data-source="post: 5931965" data-attributes="member: 7635"><p>I'd like to start a conversation to see how common combat maneuvers (bull rush, trip, grapple, disarm, sunder, etc) should be done. </p><p></p><p>A couple of ideas...</p><p></p><p>1.) In AD&D 2nd edition, they were called shots. Basically, you took a penalty to your roll and if you hit, instead of doing damage you inflicted the maneuver. Later, Combat and Tactics set individual ACs to each stunt AND forced opposed attack rolls. </p><p>2.) In Basic/BECMI, some of these attacks (parry, disarm, smash) were fighter (or demi-human) only maneuvers. A fighter could take a penalty to hit to add his whole strength score to damage (proto power attack). Thieves, clerics, and Magic-users need not apply.</p><p>3.) 3e treated them as modified attacks with specific opposed rolls and penalties, augmentable by feats. They were very realistic, but cumbersome to use.</p><p>4.) 4e treated them as powers, some do-able at-will (grab), or as part of encounter or daily powers (3[w] + trip). </p><p></p><p>The trick here is to balance out usefulness vs. repetition. In a perfect game world, disarm, sunder, trip and a basic attack are all equal choices. In reality, they are rarely equal, either being too good (trip monkeys) or poor (sunder) and lead to a lot of "ah, F* it, I attack!" scenarios. </p><p></p><p>All of this leads to a couple of universal questions...</p><p></p><p>1.) How should combat maneuvers be resolved? Should they be modified attacks, a unique stat (something like CMB/CMD in Pathfinder), or some form of power/feat/ability?</p><p>2.) Should they be limited to fighters, fightery-types, or open to all? If the latter, should fighters get bonuses to be the "best" at them?</p><p>3.) Should they be part of an attack (do damage + trip) or replace the damage? </p><p>4.) How is the best way to resist the effects? Contests? Checks? Saving Throws? or something else?</p><p>5.) Should they be a managed resource (you can use X combat maneuvers per day), be encounter-based (you can trip a foe once per encounter) or be spammable at-will? </p><p></p><p>Any and all suggestions welcomed.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Remathilis, post: 5931965, member: 7635"] I'd like to start a conversation to see how common combat maneuvers (bull rush, trip, grapple, disarm, sunder, etc) should be done. A couple of ideas... 1.) In AD&D 2nd edition, they were called shots. Basically, you took a penalty to your roll and if you hit, instead of doing damage you inflicted the maneuver. Later, Combat and Tactics set individual ACs to each stunt AND forced opposed attack rolls. 2.) In Basic/BECMI, some of these attacks (parry, disarm, smash) were fighter (or demi-human) only maneuvers. A fighter could take a penalty to hit to add his whole strength score to damage (proto power attack). Thieves, clerics, and Magic-users need not apply. 3.) 3e treated them as modified attacks with specific opposed rolls and penalties, augmentable by feats. They were very realistic, but cumbersome to use. 4.) 4e treated them as powers, some do-able at-will (grab), or as part of encounter or daily powers (3[w] + trip). The trick here is to balance out usefulness vs. repetition. In a perfect game world, disarm, sunder, trip and a basic attack are all equal choices. In reality, they are rarely equal, either being too good (trip monkeys) or poor (sunder) and lead to a lot of "ah, F* it, I attack!" scenarios. All of this leads to a couple of universal questions... 1.) How should combat maneuvers be resolved? Should they be modified attacks, a unique stat (something like CMB/CMD in Pathfinder), or some form of power/feat/ability? 2.) Should they be limited to fighters, fightery-types, or open to all? If the latter, should fighters get bonuses to be the "best" at them? 3.) Should they be part of an attack (do damage + trip) or replace the damage? 4.) How is the best way to resist the effects? Contests? Checks? Saving Throws? or something else? 5.) Should they be a managed resource (you can use X combat maneuvers per day), be encounter-based (you can trip a foe once per encounter) or be spammable at-will? Any and all suggestions welcomed. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
How should combat maneuvers be handled in Next?
Top