Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="UngeheuerLich" data-source="post: 8836253" data-attributes="member: 59057">If you read it that way, so be it.But you come in and say all is bad. So who is right?Your fixes will either make everything bad or will still have some too good combinations. As I said, every feat, every subclass can be rated. Some will be too god. Some will be too bad.Multiclassing has its root problems in the lack of good abilities of some classes at high level and the overpowerdness of some low level abilities of a few classes or subclasses... The 3 offenders are sorlock, hexadin and sorcadin...The rest is in line with single classes. So again. Why do you insist of &quot;fixing&quot; a system that has worked for us for 10 years now and replace it with an untested system that will most pobably also have issues.Why not fix the root of the problem, changing the wording of a few abilities and making it clear, that warlock slots can not be used for class abilities.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="UngeheuerLich, post: 8836253, member: 59057"] If you read it that way, so be it. But you come in and say all is bad. So who is right? Your fixes will either make everything bad or will still have some too good combinations. As I said, every feat, every subclass can be rated. Some will be too god. Some will be too bad. Multiclassing has its root problems in the lack of good abilities of some classes at high level and the overpowerdness of some low level abilities of a few classes or subclasses... The 3 offenders are sorlock, hexadin and sorcadin... The rest is in line with single classes. So again. Why do you insist of "fixing" a system that has worked for us for 10 years now and replace it with an untested system that will most pobably also have issues. Why not fix the root of the problem, changing the wording of a few abilities and making it clear, that warlock slots can not be used for class abilities. [/QUOTE]

Verification