Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="trancejeremy" data-source="post: 1073367" data-attributes="member: 924">No offense, but the situation on RPG.net is quite a bit different than you're making out. And it really didn't have to do with you, but the credibility of the reviewer in question.The reviewer in question has only reviewed products from you (which always get great praise) or competing gun book products (which always get poor reviews) and also makes statements about those products which apparently aren't true (and apparently never actually bought some of the competing PDF products).The reviews in question:<a href="http://www.rpg.net/reviews/search-review.phtml?reviewerName=David%Sinclair" target="_blank">http://www.rpg.net/reviews/search-review.phtml?reviewerName=David%Sinclair</a>(in case anyone is curious)He's written 6 reviews about your products, and the average substance is 5 (out of 5) and 3 reviews of other products (all competing gun books) and they all get a 2. So it really does seem like the guy happens to be a friend of yours and is trying to help you out.  Because why would he only review your stuff? If he just liked gun books, he'd only have reviewed your guns books. But he's reviewed your other stuff as well. I'm not saying that is the case, I'm just saying there is probably a reason it might look a bit odd to some people. This does illustrate a good lesson though - you need to find reviewers that have credibility.A reviewer is only as good as their reputation. Becuase in essense, you're taking their word for it. Anyone can write a flowery review about anything, it's a reviewers judgement that is important.(I'm not saying that is the case with the Big Bang books, but Mr. Jorgenson would send comp copies to some of his critics and ask for review, it would settle the case. It might be a bit risky, but if his products are really good, then he would be completely vindicated...)</blockquote>

Verification