Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
How to hide a creature's magical auras
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="michaiel" data-source="post: 6289482" data-attributes="member: 92302"><p>What are the various methods of detecting magic and/or locating that magic, either via magical auras or "magic potential"? (I don't care about determining strength, school, or other such properties; the detection and locating itself is undesirable). And what are the various methods of avoiding detection?</p><p></p><p>The magic detections I know of are:</p><ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul"><em>Detect Magic</em></li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul"><em>Identify</em></li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul"><em>Arcane Sight</em></li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul"><em>Analyze Dweomer</em></li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Dweomersight (Balhannoth, MM4, p. 15)</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Magic Sense (Mageripper Swarm, MM4, p. 98) -- sounds just like Arcane Sight</li> </ul><p>The ways to hide magic (that I know of) are:</p><ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul"><em>Nondetection</em></li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul"><em>Nystul's Magic Aura</em></li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul"><em>Misdirection</em></li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">D&D 3.5 version of Pathfinder's <em>Mask Dweomer</em>?</li> </ul><p>Of those, <em>Identify</em> and <em>Nystul's Magic Aura</em> can only target objects, so they are out for detecting / hiding creature auras.</p><p></p><p></p><p><strong>Detection and Line of Sight</strong></p><p><em>Analyze Dweomer</em> requires that you be able to see the creature in order to analyze it, so it's easily avoided via mundane stealth.</p><p> </p><p><em>Arcane Sight</em> also seems to imply that you have to be able to physically see the creature or object in order to detect its aura. It uses wording like "You know the location and power of all magical auras <strong>within your sight</strong>", and "If the items or creatures bearing the auras are in <strong>line of sight</strong>". However, it says it functions much like <em>Detect Magic</em>, and that spell makes no mention of line of sight until giving the option to make Spellcraft checks to determine school of magic (as an optional step of the third round). <em>Detect Magic</em>'s first round gives "Presence or absence of magical auras" (and the third round gives location), so that means they auto-detect me if my aura is present on the same plane, irrespective of physical detection. Should I assume that <em>Arcane Sight</em> would auto-detect presence and location as well?</p><p></p><p>[Also, see "True Seeing" below.]</p><p></p><p></p><p><strong>Masking Effects (and the checks / saves to bypass them)</strong></p><p><em>Nondetection</em> works against <em>Detect Magic</em> and <em>Arcane Sight</em>, though only if they fail the CL check.</p><p></p><p>What is <em>Misdirection</em> like? I'm not sure how useful it would be. For one, it allows a Will save (rather than the CL check of <em>Nondetection</em>; is that better / worse?)</p><p> </p><p><em>Mask Dweomer</em> is interesting. It's basically like <em>Nystul's Magic Aura</em>, except that it can target creatures too, and instead of <em>Identify</em> being able to bypass it on a successful Will save, <em>Arcane Sight</em> can bypass it on a successful Will save (and importantly, it completely thwarts <em>Detect Magic</em>, unlike the above two).</p><p></p><p></p><p><strong>True Seeing</strong></p><p>How would <em>True Seeing</em> work alongside the detection effects? A couple of the hiding effects (<em>Misdirection</em> and <em>Mask Dweomer</em>) are of the Illusion school, so I assume <em>True Seeing</em> would negate their benefits. Can this negation be used in conjunction with <em>Arcane Sight</em> or other to properly see the aura? I am not sure how the clause that says "the spell effects cannot be further enhance with known magic" works. Also, <em>True Seeing</em> relies on being able to see a creature, so if I were hiding normally, it wouldn't help out anyways.... right?</p><p></p><p><strong></strong></p><p><strong>Monster Abilities -- more limited or less limited than the spells?</strong></p><p>What about the monster abilities? Is there any way to avoid them? Would they also get to make caster level checks / will saves against <em>Nondetection</em> and the like?</p><p> </p><p></p><p>What other detect and mask effects are there? Is there a better way to mask magic than these?? I would like my character's magic to be nigh undetectable! All options are open to me -- I'm still building him, and this is a core component for the campaign.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="michaiel, post: 6289482, member: 92302"] What are the various methods of detecting magic and/or locating that magic, either via magical auras or "magic potential"? (I don't care about determining strength, school, or other such properties; the detection and locating itself is undesirable). And what are the various methods of avoiding detection? The magic detections I know of are: [LIST] [*][I]Detect Magic[/I] [*][I]Identify[/I] [*][I]Arcane Sight[/I] [*][I]Analyze Dweomer[/I] [*]Dweomersight (Balhannoth, MM4, p. 15) [*]Magic Sense (Mageripper Swarm, MM4, p. 98) -- sounds just like Arcane Sight [/LIST] The ways to hide magic (that I know of) are: [LIST] [*][I]Nondetection[/I] [*][I]Nystul's Magic Aura[/I] [*][I]Misdirection[/I] [*]D&D 3.5 version of Pathfinder's [I]Mask Dweomer[/I]? [/LIST] Of those, [I]Identify[/I] and [I]Nystul's Magic Aura[/I] can only target objects, so they are out for detecting / hiding creature auras. [B]Detection and Line of Sight[/B] [I]Analyze Dweomer[/I] requires that you be able to see the creature in order to analyze it, so it's easily avoided via mundane stealth. [I]Arcane Sight[/I] also seems to imply that you have to be able to physically see the creature or object in order to detect its aura. It uses wording like "You know the location and power of all magical auras [B]within your sight[/B]", and "If the items or creatures bearing the auras are in [B]line of sight[/B]". However, it says it functions much like [I]Detect Magic[/I], and that spell makes no mention of line of sight until giving the option to make Spellcraft checks to determine school of magic (as an optional step of the third round). [I]Detect Magic[/I]'s first round gives "Presence or absence of magical auras" (and the third round gives location), so that means they auto-detect me if my aura is present on the same plane, irrespective of physical detection. Should I assume that [I]Arcane Sight[/I] would auto-detect presence and location as well? [Also, see "True Seeing" below.] [B]Masking Effects (and the checks / saves to bypass them)[/B] [I]Nondetection[/I] works against [I]Detect Magic[/I] and [I]Arcane Sight[/I], though only if they fail the CL check. What is [I]Misdirection[/I] like? I'm not sure how useful it would be. For one, it allows a Will save (rather than the CL check of [I]Nondetection[/I]; is that better / worse?) [I]Mask Dweomer[/I] is interesting. It's basically like [I]Nystul's Magic Aura[/I], except that it can target creatures too, and instead of [I]Identify[/I] being able to bypass it on a successful Will save, [I]Arcane Sight[/I] can bypass it on a successful Will save (and importantly, it completely thwarts [I]Detect Magic[/I], unlike the above two). [B]True Seeing[/B] How would [I]True Seeing[/I] work alongside the detection effects? A couple of the hiding effects ([I]Misdirection[/I] and [I]Mask Dweomer[/I]) are of the Illusion school, so I assume [I]True Seeing[/I] would negate their benefits. Can this negation be used in conjunction with [I]Arcane Sight[/I] or other to properly see the aura? I am not sure how the clause that says "the spell effects cannot be further enhance with known magic" works. Also, [I]True Seeing[/I] relies on being able to see a creature, so if I were hiding normally, it wouldn't help out anyways.... right? [B] Monster Abilities -- more limited or less limited than the spells?[/B] What about the monster abilities? Is there any way to avoid them? Would they also get to make caster level checks / will saves against [I]Nondetection[/I] and the like? What other detect and mask effects are there? Is there a better way to mask magic than these?? I would like my character's magic to be nigh undetectable! All options are open to me -- I'm still building him, and this is a core component for the campaign. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
How to hide a creature's magical auras
Top