Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
How to kill a blue dragon?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="MrMyth" data-source="post: 4546612" data-attributes="member: 61155"><p>They don't specifically mention any vertical aspect. They do specifically mention how the powers work, in terms that function perfectly fine for vertical dimension, without any indication we should suddenly stop following what the rules rather clearly say. And while the diagrims show only horizontal instances, there is nothing in the rules that is similarly restricted. </p><p> </p><p></p><p> </p><p>Sure, but the way the rules are written does not in any way imply a limitation to a single horizontal plane. Yes, it would be nice for them to have outright discussed it, but your interpretation requires specifically adding in changes to how they describe the rules working. </p><p> </p><p></p><p> </p><p>Well... yes. I would certainly say a fighter who is attacking all enemies in a Close Burst 1 - which is to say, swinging his sword at every enemy in reach - would be allowed to attack both an enemy in front of him, as well as an enemy directly over his head. I would, in fact, be quite appalled at a DM who ruled otherwise. </p><p> </p><p></p><p> </p><p>Not at all, since I don't expect to fight a bunch of soldiers who suddenly form a human pyramid. There circumstances in which that would be abusable are essentially non-existent. And if there <em>is</em> a bunch of bats, all flying at different heights, but all within a few squares of each other, I would find it extremely underpowered for a DM to start claiming the wizard's fireball can only hit one of them. </p><p> </p><p></p><p> </p><p>That doesn't make things simple at all - it raises all sorts of questions. In fact, if you are forcing the dragon to only cast his Lightning Burst down the relative plane between himself and a PC, it would mean the attack is reduced to a 1 x 3 square, instead of a 3 x 3 square. That certainly seems more complicated than just running the rules as written. It might make things easier for the PCs, sure, and you are certainly free to add in house rules to that effect in a game you are running - but it seems a needless change to the rules that only really produces more questions and complications.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="MrMyth, post: 4546612, member: 61155"] They don't specifically mention any vertical aspect. They do specifically mention how the powers work, in terms that function perfectly fine for vertical dimension, without any indication we should suddenly stop following what the rules rather clearly say. And while the diagrims show only horizontal instances, there is nothing in the rules that is similarly restricted. Sure, but the way the rules are written does not in any way imply a limitation to a single horizontal plane. Yes, it would be nice for them to have outright discussed it, but your interpretation requires specifically adding in changes to how they describe the rules working. Well... yes. I would certainly say a fighter who is attacking all enemies in a Close Burst 1 - which is to say, swinging his sword at every enemy in reach - would be allowed to attack both an enemy in front of him, as well as an enemy directly over his head. I would, in fact, be quite appalled at a DM who ruled otherwise. Not at all, since I don't expect to fight a bunch of soldiers who suddenly form a human pyramid. There circumstances in which that would be abusable are essentially non-existent. And if there [I]is[/I] a bunch of bats, all flying at different heights, but all within a few squares of each other, I would find it extremely underpowered for a DM to start claiming the wizard's fireball can only hit one of them. That doesn't make things simple at all - it raises all sorts of questions. In fact, if you are forcing the dragon to only cast his Lightning Burst down the relative plane between himself and a PC, it would mean the attack is reduced to a 1 x 3 square, instead of a 3 x 3 square. That certainly seems more complicated than just running the rules as written. It might make things easier for the PCs, sure, and you are certainly free to add in house rules to that effect in a game you are running - but it seems a needless change to the rules that only really produces more questions and complications. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
How to kill a blue dragon?
Top