Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
How to Legally Overcome Flatfooted
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Gantros" data-source="post: 2118960" data-attributes="member: 15836"><p>Okay... the point I was disputing was that initiating combat always = rolling for initiative. I think the frustrating part was that you made those two points which no one was disputing, and presented them as proof that you can't start a battle with a readied action. What I've been debating in this thread is, can you ready an action prior to anyone rolling initiative, thus allowing you a chance to act before someone else when hostilities start and avoid being flat-footed, even if they win initiative.</p><p></p><p>My position is that yes, in some circumstances this is possible without having to change the rules. I didn't want to quote a large passage from the DMG, but essentially the example I referenced says that once one or both parties become aware of the other, the DM can start tracking rounds (effectively initiating combat), and the combatants can take preparatory actions. As long as none of these actions are contested (i.e. it doesn't matter who goes first), then there is no need to roll initiative. I submit that during this time it is allowable for someone to Ready an action. Once a contested action does occur, initiative is rolled and any readied actions are resolved normally.</p><p></p><p>I think along the way some confusion has been created around whether someone can force combat to start by readying an action, which sounds like it violates the rules. Perhaps a better way to put it is, if someone decides that they want to ready an action, and the DM decides that it makes sense to do so, then combat should be started at that point, allowing the Ready action to be taken. By starting combat, the DM also gives the opposing party an opportunity to take actions of their own, if they are aware of the threat. If the actions taken by each side result in some form of interaction where the order of action is important, then intiative must be rolled and combat proceeds as normal.</p><p></p><p>I believe this solves the problem that prompted this thread, and can gracefully handle all the other scenarios presented along its course. I also believe it doesn't break any rules, although it may not be obvious that this is allowable from they way they are written. I was hoping people could think of any cases where this just wouldn't work, or would result in unrealistic situations.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Gantros, post: 2118960, member: 15836"] Okay... the point I was disputing was that initiating combat always = rolling for initiative. I think the frustrating part was that you made those two points which no one was disputing, and presented them as proof that you can't start a battle with a readied action. What I've been debating in this thread is, can you ready an action prior to anyone rolling initiative, thus allowing you a chance to act before someone else when hostilities start and avoid being flat-footed, even if they win initiative. My position is that yes, in some circumstances this is possible without having to change the rules. I didn't want to quote a large passage from the DMG, but essentially the example I referenced says that once one or both parties become aware of the other, the DM can start tracking rounds (effectively initiating combat), and the combatants can take preparatory actions. As long as none of these actions are contested (i.e. it doesn't matter who goes first), then there is no need to roll initiative. I submit that during this time it is allowable for someone to Ready an action. Once a contested action does occur, initiative is rolled and any readied actions are resolved normally. I think along the way some confusion has been created around whether someone can force combat to start by readying an action, which sounds like it violates the rules. Perhaps a better way to put it is, if someone decides that they want to ready an action, and the DM decides that it makes sense to do so, then combat should be started at that point, allowing the Ready action to be taken. By starting combat, the DM also gives the opposing party an opportunity to take actions of their own, if they are aware of the threat. If the actions taken by each side result in some form of interaction where the order of action is important, then intiative must be rolled and combat proceeds as normal. I believe this solves the problem that prompted this thread, and can gracefully handle all the other scenarios presented along its course. I also believe it doesn't break any rules, although it may not be obvious that this is allowable from they way they are written. I was hoping people could think of any cases where this just wouldn't work, or would result in unrealistic situations. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
How to Legally Overcome Flatfooted
Top