Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition (A5E)
How to reach 20th Level in 45 days — An analysis of "adventuring day" per character level
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Xethreau" data-source="post: 8711565" data-attributes="member: 57584"><p>I miss the days in 4e where you could curate an entire dungeon with the rote mathematical guidelines that no matter the character level, X encounters yielded 1 character level. So I've very often wondered about how a similar system would work for 5e/A5e, and the fact that we now can design adventuring days based on Encounter Points goes a VERY long way. Indeed, as you will find later in this thread <strong>I did synthesize a Campaign Calendar that is A5e's equivalent of 4e encounter design! </strong>But the road was arduous, and discovering how many adventuring days there are per character level l made me <em>reassess some of my fundamental assumptions of character math in 5e/A5e</em>.</p><p></p><p><strong><span style="font-size: 18px">My Approach</span></strong></p><p>To create a baseline analysis. These are the terms and assumptions I used.</p><ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul"><strong>Given</strong>: Encounter Points by character level per day</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul"><strong>Assumption</strong>: XP Per Encounter = XP of a <strong>medium encounter</strong> for<strong> 4 characters</strong> with the <strong>XP divided equally</strong>.<ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">There is not a clear pattern on how this number grows, so I had to input the figures by hand</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Clearly different assumptions about party and encounter composition might yield different results, but I thought this would be a good normative baseline. [Edit] A cursory glance reveals that a diet of only easy, hard, or deadly encounters all have XP per encounter point yields that vary wildly from a pure medium diet. (Higher difficulty, better XP yield ratio.) My suggestion would be to balance the ratio better by spending an equal number of encounter points on easy encounters as spent on hard and deadly. [/edit]</li> </ul></li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul"><strong>XP to Next Level</strong> = XP threshold for next level - XP threshold for the current level.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul"><strong>XP per Day</strong> = Encounter Points * XP Per Encounter</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul"><strong>Adventuring Days to Next Level</strong> = XP to Next Level / XP per Day</li> </ul><p></p><p>[SPOILER="Table: Adventuring Days Per Level"]</p><p></p><table style='width: 100%'><tr><td>Level</td><td>Encounter Points per Day</td><td>XP Per Encounter (Medium @ 4, ÷4)</td><td>XP to Next Level</td><td>XP per Day</td><td>Adventuring Days to Next Level</td></tr><tr><td>1st</td><td>1</td><td>50</td><td>300</td><td>50</td><td>6</td></tr><tr><td>2nd</td><td>1</td><td>175</td><td>600</td><td>175</td><td>3.5</td></tr><tr><td>3rd</td><td>2</td><td>275</td><td>1,800</td><td>550</td><td>3.25</td></tr><tr><td>4th</td><td>2</td><td>450</td><td>3,800</td><td>900</td><td>4.25</td></tr><tr><td>5th</td><td>4</td><td>750</td><td>7,500</td><td>3000</td><td>2.5</td></tr><tr><td>6th</td><td>4</td><td>975</td><td>9,000</td><td>3900</td><td>2.3</td></tr><tr><td>7th</td><td>4</td><td>1250</td><td>11,000</td><td>5000</td><td>2.2</td></tr><tr><td>8th</td><td>4</td><td>1800</td><td>14,000</td><td>7200</td><td>2</td></tr><tr><td>9th</td><td>4</td><td>2100</td><td>16,000</td><td>8400</td><td>2</td></tr><tr><td>10th</td><td>4</td><td>2500</td><td>21,000</td><td>10000</td><td>2.1</td></tr><tr><td>11th</td><td>6</td><td>3250</td><td>15,000</td><td>19500</td><td>0.75</td></tr><tr><td>12th</td><td>6</td><td>3750</td><td>20,000</td><td>22500</td><td>0.9</td></tr><tr><td>13th</td><td>6</td><td>4500</td><td>20,000</td><td>27000</td><td>0.75</td></tr><tr><td>14th</td><td>6</td><td>5000</td><td>25,000</td><td>30000</td><td>0.8</td></tr><tr><td>15th</td><td>6</td><td>6250</td><td>30,000</td><td>37500</td><td>0.8</td></tr><tr><td>16th</td><td>6</td><td>8250</td><td>30,000</td><td>49500</td><td>0.6</td></tr><tr><td>17th</td><td>8</td><td>10250</td><td>40,000</td><td>82000</td><td>0.5</td></tr><tr><td>18th</td><td>8</td><td>15500</td><td>40,000</td><td>124000</td><td>0.33</td></tr><tr><td>19th</td><td>8</td><td>18750</td><td>50,000</td><td>150000</td><td>0.33</td></tr><tr><td>20th</td><td>8</td><td>n/a</td><td>n/a</td><td>n/a</td><td>n/a</td></tr></table><p></p><p>[/SPOILER]</p><p></p><p><strong><span style="font-size: 18px">What do we see here?</span></strong></p><p>Looking at this chart, and assuming that my assumptions are reasonable and that the math looks similar for other party compositions, it looks like <strong>there is not a simple "one-size fits all" solution to top-down adventure design based on character level progression</strong>. The adventuring day per level of some levels is quite high, and others is quite low. In fact, adventuring days per level generally<em> decreases</em> at higher level, whereas I<em> fully expected</em> that figure to <em>increase</em>. If a player character finds themselves embroiled in medium challenges every day and spend all their Encounter Points, then (after rounding up adventuring days due to the long rest phenomenon)... <strong>PCs can reach 20th level after merely 44 full adventuring days</strong>.</p><p></p><p><strong><span style="font-size: 18px">So where does this leave us? </span></strong></p><p>Discovering the length of an adventuring career (44 full adventuring days) leaves us with some ramifications on how to design campaigns</p><p></p><p>On the one hand, these findings validate an<strong> emergent, OSR approach</strong> to campaign design. The short adventuring career length means we don't have to worry all too much about top-down design. Adventuring days per level<em> do not exhibit the exponential curve I expected to see,</em> meaning that relying solely on the emergent encounter design and XP calculation will still produce organic campaigns of sensible duration. That said, whether players will even be able to achieve a full adventuring day depends on the tone and genre of the campaign. If the players can't make it to the City of Brass to <a href="https://xkcd.com/311/" target="_blank">beat up efreet after efreet,</a> they may not be able "get those gains." There are so many elder dragons on the planet, and there is (probably) only one terrasque. So an adventuring day of 1 or less looks like an easy goal to meet, but it may not be realistic or appropriate for the campaign.</p><p></p><p>That said, there are those of us planners who do prefer to have some <strong>"top-down perspective"</strong> and norms. I like having these guidelines because it helps me to know how long a given story arch of the campaign should be. (I hate it when a side-quest spirals out into an entire mini-campaign… I'm looking at you, wererats!) The 44 adventuring day career means we can actually make an Encounter Point budget for how long we want a story arch to last. Sparing you a second math mini-essay, here's what that looks like:</p><p></p><p>[SPOILER="Mini-Tool: Campaign Calendar"]</p><p><strong>Campaign Calendar</strong></p><p></p><table style='width: 100%'><tr><td>Level</td><td>Encounter Points this level</td><td>Expected Adventuring Days</td></tr><tr><td>1st</td><td>6</td><td>6+</td></tr><tr><td>2nd</td><td>4</td><td>4+</td></tr><tr><td>3rd</td><td>7</td><td>4+</td></tr><tr><td>4th</td><td>8</td><td>5+</td></tr><tr><td>5th</td><td>10</td><td>3+</td></tr><tr><td>6th</td><td>10</td><td>3+</td></tr><tr><td>7th</td><td>9</td><td>3+</td></tr><tr><td>8th</td><td>8</td><td>2+</td></tr><tr><td>9th</td><td>8</td><td>2+</td></tr><tr><td>10th</td><td>9</td><td>3+</td></tr><tr><td>11th</td><td>5</td><td>1+</td></tr><tr><td>12th</td><td>6</td><td>1+</td></tr><tr><td>13th</td><td>5</td><td>1+</td></tr><tr><td>14th</td><td>5</td><td>1+</td></tr><tr><td>15th</td><td>5</td><td>1+</td></tr><tr><td>16th</td><td>4</td><td>1+</td></tr><tr><td>17th</td><td>4</td><td>1+</td></tr><tr><td>18th</td><td>3</td><td>1+</td></tr><tr><td>19th</td><td>3</td><td>1+</td></tr></table><p><strong>Note:</strong> Easy encounters yield less XP per Encounter Point. Hard and Deadly encounters yeild more XP per Encounter Point. My advice is to spend an equal number of Encounter points on Easy encounters as spent on Hard and Deadly encounters.</p><p></p><p>[/SPOILER]</p><p></p><p>Now, both the "emergent" and "top-down" approaches are to say nothing about <strong>downtime </strong>(edit: or <strong>travel time</strong>, thanks [USER=6796468]@Steampunkette[/USER] ). Moving 44 adventuring days to a work week (two rest days after 5 adventuring days) already puts us at <strong>26.4 work weeks, or just under 7 months</strong>. Add extended vacations at brothels, seasons leading a faction, and years ruling a kingdom… [edit]And of course the traveling times between all this. [/edit] Now we begin to see an adventuring timeline that makes more narrative sense.</p><p></p><p>—</p><p></p><p>In conclusion, I hope you all found this analysis helpful! That is, I hope it is thought-provoking and provides utility and context as you design your campaigns. As always PEACH and let me know what you think! (And, especially since there is arithmetic involved here, please let me know if I glitched or otherwise missed something!) And, most especially, if you find the findings or approach here controversial, don't hesitate to say so!</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Xethreau, post: 8711565, member: 57584"] I miss the days in 4e where you could curate an entire dungeon with the rote mathematical guidelines that no matter the character level, X encounters yielded 1 character level. So I've very often wondered about how a similar system would work for 5e/A5e, and the fact that we now can design adventuring days based on Encounter Points goes a VERY long way. Indeed, as you will find later in this thread [B]I did synthesize a Campaign Calendar that is A5e's equivalent of 4e encounter design! [/B]But the road was arduous, and discovering how many adventuring days there are per character level l made me [I]reassess some of my fundamental assumptions of character math in 5e/A5e[/I]. [B][SIZE=5]My Approach[/SIZE][/B] To create a baseline analysis. These are the terms and assumptions I used. [LIST] [*][B]Given[/B]: Encounter Points by character level per day [*][B]Assumption[/B]: XP Per Encounter = XP of a [B]medium encounter[/B] for[B] 4 characters[/B] with the [B]XP divided equally[/B]. [LIST] [*]There is not a clear pattern on how this number grows, so I had to input the figures by hand [*]Clearly different assumptions about party and encounter composition might yield different results, but I thought this would be a good normative baseline. [Edit] A cursory glance reveals that a diet of only easy, hard, or deadly encounters all have XP per encounter point yields that vary wildly from a pure medium diet. (Higher difficulty, better XP yield ratio.) My suggestion would be to balance the ratio better by spending an equal number of encounter points on easy encounters as spent on hard and deadly. [/edit] [/LIST] [*][B]XP to Next Level[/B] = XP threshold for next level - XP threshold for the current level. [*][B]XP per Day[/B] = Encounter Points * XP Per Encounter [*][B]Adventuring Days to Next Level[/B] = XP to Next Level / XP per Day [/LIST] [SPOILER="Table: Adventuring Days Per Level"] [TABLE] [TR] [TD]Level[/TD] [TD]Encounter Points per Day[/TD] [TD]XP Per Encounter (Medium @ 4, ÷4)[/TD] [TD]XP to Next Level[/TD] [TD]XP per Day[/TD] [TD]Adventuring Days to Next Level[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]1st[/TD] [TD]1[/TD] [TD]50[/TD] [TD]300[/TD] [TD]50[/TD] [TD]6[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]2nd[/TD] [TD]1[/TD] [TD]175[/TD] [TD]600[/TD] [TD]175[/TD] [TD]3.5[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]3rd[/TD] [TD]2[/TD] [TD]275[/TD] [TD]1,800[/TD] [TD]550[/TD] [TD]3.25[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]4th[/TD] [TD]2[/TD] [TD]450[/TD] [TD]3,800[/TD] [TD]900[/TD] [TD]4.25[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]5th[/TD] [TD]4[/TD] [TD]750[/TD] [TD]7,500[/TD] [TD]3000[/TD] [TD]2.5[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]6th[/TD] [TD]4[/TD] [TD]975[/TD] [TD]9,000[/TD] [TD]3900[/TD] [TD]2.3[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]7th[/TD] [TD]4[/TD] [TD]1250[/TD] [TD]11,000[/TD] [TD]5000[/TD] [TD]2.2[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]8th[/TD] [TD]4[/TD] [TD]1800[/TD] [TD]14,000[/TD] [TD]7200[/TD] [TD]2[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]9th[/TD] [TD]4[/TD] [TD]2100[/TD] [TD]16,000[/TD] [TD]8400[/TD] [TD]2[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]10th[/TD] [TD]4[/TD] [TD]2500[/TD] [TD]21,000[/TD] [TD]10000[/TD] [TD]2.1[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]11th[/TD] [TD]6[/TD] [TD]3250[/TD] [TD]15,000[/TD] [TD]19500[/TD] [TD]0.75[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]12th[/TD] [TD]6[/TD] [TD]3750[/TD] [TD]20,000[/TD] [TD]22500[/TD] [TD]0.9[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]13th[/TD] [TD]6[/TD] [TD]4500[/TD] [TD]20,000[/TD] [TD]27000[/TD] [TD]0.75[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]14th[/TD] [TD]6[/TD] [TD]5000[/TD] [TD]25,000[/TD] [TD]30000[/TD] [TD]0.8[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]15th[/TD] [TD]6[/TD] [TD]6250[/TD] [TD]30,000[/TD] [TD]37500[/TD] [TD]0.8[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]16th[/TD] [TD]6[/TD] [TD]8250[/TD] [TD]30,000[/TD] [TD]49500[/TD] [TD]0.6[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]17th[/TD] [TD]8[/TD] [TD]10250[/TD] [TD]40,000[/TD] [TD]82000[/TD] [TD]0.5[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]18th[/TD] [TD]8[/TD] [TD]15500[/TD] [TD]40,000[/TD] [TD]124000[/TD] [TD]0.33[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]19th[/TD] [TD]8[/TD] [TD]18750[/TD] [TD]50,000[/TD] [TD]150000[/TD] [TD]0.33[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]20th[/TD] [TD]8[/TD] [TD]n/a[/TD] [TD]n/a[/TD] [TD]n/a[/TD] [TD]n/a[/TD] [/TR] [/TABLE] [/SPOILER] [B][SIZE=5]What do we see here?[/SIZE][/B] Looking at this chart, and assuming that my assumptions are reasonable and that the math looks similar for other party compositions, it looks like [B]there is not a simple "one-size fits all" solution to top-down adventure design based on character level progression[/B]. The adventuring day per level of some levels is quite high, and others is quite low. In fact, adventuring days per level generally[I] decreases[/I] at higher level, whereas I[I] fully expected[/I] that figure to [I]increase[/I]. If a player character finds themselves embroiled in medium challenges every day and spend all their Encounter Points, then (after rounding up adventuring days due to the long rest phenomenon)... [B]PCs can reach 20th level after merely 44 full adventuring days[/B]. [B][SIZE=5]So where does this leave us? [/SIZE][/B] Discovering the length of an adventuring career (44 full adventuring days) leaves us with some ramifications on how to design campaigns On the one hand, these findings validate an[B] emergent, OSR approach[/B] to campaign design. The short adventuring career length means we don't have to worry all too much about top-down design. Adventuring days per level[I] do not exhibit the exponential curve I expected to see,[/I] meaning that relying solely on the emergent encounter design and XP calculation will still produce organic campaigns of sensible duration. That said, whether players will even be able to achieve a full adventuring day depends on the tone and genre of the campaign. If the players can't make it to the City of Brass to [URL='https://xkcd.com/311/']beat up efreet after efreet,[/URL] they may not be able "get those gains." There are so many elder dragons on the planet, and there is (probably) only one terrasque. So an adventuring day of 1 or less looks like an easy goal to meet, but it may not be realistic or appropriate for the campaign. That said, there are those of us planners who do prefer to have some [B]"top-down perspective"[/B] and norms. I like having these guidelines because it helps me to know how long a given story arch of the campaign should be. (I hate it when a side-quest spirals out into an entire mini-campaign… I'm looking at you, wererats!) The 44 adventuring day career means we can actually make an Encounter Point budget for how long we want a story arch to last. Sparing you a second math mini-essay, here's what that looks like: [SPOILER="Mini-Tool: Campaign Calendar"] [B]Campaign Calendar[/B] [TABLE] [TR] [TD]Level[/TD] [TD]Encounter Points this level[/TD] [TD]Expected Adventuring Days[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]1st[/TD] [TD]6[/TD] [TD]6+[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]2nd[/TD] [TD]4[/TD] [TD]4+[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]3rd[/TD] [TD]7[/TD] [TD]4+[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]4th[/TD] [TD]8[/TD] [TD]5+[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]5th[/TD] [TD]10[/TD] [TD]3+[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]6th[/TD] [TD]10[/TD] [TD]3+[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]7th[/TD] [TD]9[/TD] [TD]3+[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]8th[/TD] [TD]8[/TD] [TD]2+[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]9th[/TD] [TD]8[/TD] [TD]2+[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]10th[/TD] [TD]9[/TD] [TD]3+[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]11th[/TD] [TD]5[/TD] [TD]1+[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]12th[/TD] [TD]6[/TD] [TD]1+[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]13th[/TD] [TD]5[/TD] [TD]1+[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]14th[/TD] [TD]5[/TD] [TD]1+[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]15th[/TD] [TD]5[/TD] [TD]1+[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]16th[/TD] [TD]4[/TD] [TD]1+[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]17th[/TD] [TD]4[/TD] [TD]1+[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]18th[/TD] [TD]3[/TD] [TD]1+[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]19th[/TD] [TD]3[/TD] [TD]1+[/TD] [/TR] [/TABLE] [B]Note:[/B] Easy encounters yield less XP per Encounter Point. Hard and Deadly encounters yeild more XP per Encounter Point. My advice is to spend an equal number of Encounter points on Easy encounters as spent on Hard and Deadly encounters. [/SPOILER] Now, both the "emergent" and "top-down" approaches are to say nothing about [B]downtime [/B](edit: or [B]travel time[/B], thanks [USER=6796468]@Steampunkette[/USER] ). Moving 44 adventuring days to a work week (two rest days after 5 adventuring days) already puts us at [B]26.4 work weeks, or just under 7 months[/B]. Add extended vacations at brothels, seasons leading a faction, and years ruling a kingdom… [edit]And of course the traveling times between all this. [/edit] Now we begin to see an adventuring timeline that makes more narrative sense. — In conclusion, I hope you all found this analysis helpful! That is, I hope it is thought-provoking and provides utility and context as you design your campaigns. As always PEACH and let me know what you think! (And, especially since there is arithmetic involved here, please let me know if I glitched or otherwise missed something!) And, most especially, if you find the findings or approach here controversial, don't hesitate to say so! [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition (A5E)
How to reach 20th Level in 45 days — An analysis of "adventuring day" per character level
Top