Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
How to resolve multiple "at the start of your turn" effects and miss damage
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="MrMyth" data-source="post: 5178448" data-attributes="member: 61155"><p>Sure, but you did basically tell someone, who was trying to actively discuss what the core rules themselves said, that they had no place in this discussion: "Sounds like it's time for you to move on, then."</p><p> </p><p>That was largely the reason I responded - it seemed like an active statement for someone to basically 'get out', because they didn't agree with DracoSuave's declaration that the only correct answer is "whatever the DM feels like at the time." </p><p> </p><p>Which, yeah, pretty much came across as saying 'the rules don't matter'.</p><p> </p><p>I'm all for seeing how other DMs are handling the situation, and looking at far more than just the rules themselves for how to resolve situations like But I also think there were elements in the rules that were still worth looking at, and the response to just ignore them, and that the written rules were meaningless beside a DM's judgement call, was of little use to the actual discussion at hand. </p><p></p><p>Is this the place to ask for an official rules amendment? Well.. no, I'd imagine that would be the WotC forums or via e-mail. But it is the place to ask for what the rules might actively say about an issue, and I don't think there is anything wrong with doing just that.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="MrMyth, post: 5178448, member: 61155"] Sure, but you did basically tell someone, who was trying to actively discuss what the core rules themselves said, that they had no place in this discussion: "Sounds like it's time for you to move on, then." That was largely the reason I responded - it seemed like an active statement for someone to basically 'get out', because they didn't agree with DracoSuave's declaration that the only correct answer is "whatever the DM feels like at the time." Which, yeah, pretty much came across as saying 'the rules don't matter'. I'm all for seeing how other DMs are handling the situation, and looking at far more than just the rules themselves for how to resolve situations like But I also think there were elements in the rules that were still worth looking at, and the response to just ignore them, and that the written rules were meaningless beside a DM's judgement call, was of little use to the actual discussion at hand. Is this the place to ask for an official rules amendment? Well.. no, I'd imagine that would be the WotC forums or via e-mail. But it is the place to ask for what the rules might actively say about an issue, and I don't think there is anything wrong with doing just that. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
How to resolve multiple "at the start of your turn" effects and miss damage
Top