Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Enchanted Trinkets Complete--a hardcover book containing over 500 magic items for your D&D games!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
How to rule out convincing people of something?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Plane Sailing" data-source="post: 4335000" data-attributes="member: 114"><p>You say that Bluff is for telling lies - but actually Bluff is about getting someone to believe something which is implausible; arguably, convincing somebody about something really weird (but true) is thus a legitimate use of bluff.</p><p></p><p>I don't think you could do an opposed check with insight though - because then poor bluffers would be better at convincing at an unlikely truth!</p><p></p><p>For campaign specific situations I'd use skill challenges. For simple situations which are not so significant I'd probably be half inclined to base DCs on the 3e rules as a static check as follows:</p><p></p><p>The target wants to believe you. DC15</p><p>The bluff is believable and doesn’t affect the target much. DC20</p><p>The bluff is a little hard to believe or puts the target at some risk. DC25</p><p>The bluff is hard to believe or puts the target at significant risk. DC30</p><p>The bluff is way out there, almost too incredible to consider. DC40</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Plane Sailing, post: 4335000, member: 114"] You say that Bluff is for telling lies - but actually Bluff is about getting someone to believe something which is implausible; arguably, convincing somebody about something really weird (but true) is thus a legitimate use of bluff. I don't think you could do an opposed check with insight though - because then poor bluffers would be better at convincing at an unlikely truth! For campaign specific situations I'd use skill challenges. For simple situations which are not so significant I'd probably be half inclined to base DCs on the 3e rules as a static check as follows: The target wants to believe you. DC15 The bluff is believable and doesn’t affect the target much. DC20 The bluff is a little hard to believe or puts the target at some risk. DC25 The bluff is hard to believe or puts the target at significant risk. DC30 The bluff is way out there, almost too incredible to consider. DC40 [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
How to rule out convincing people of something?
Top