Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Cadence" data-source="post: 8938638" data-attributes="member: 6701124">For my Dungeon23 document as I'm going along, I put in the following for the things I did new.&quot;The description of &lt;insert name here&gt; below is an adaptation of material taken from the System Reference Document 5.1 (“SRD 5.1”) by Wizards of the Coast LLC and available at <a href="https://dnd.wizards.com/resources/systems-reference-document" target="_blank">Systems Reference Document | Dungeons &amp; Dragons</a>. The SRD 5.1 is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License available at <a href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode" target="_blank">Creative Commons — Attribution 4.0 International — CC BY 4.0</a> .&quot;I'm curious if that is sufficient.&nbsp; It's basically the wording WotC asked for, but noting it is an adaptation.&nbsp;&nbsp; (In most cases it was spllicing together a bunch of creatures and spells - so naming them individually seemed unuseful).</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Cadence, post: 8938638, member: 6701124"] For my Dungeon23 document as I'm going along, I put in the following for the things I did new. "The description of <insert name here> below is an adaptation of material taken from the System Reference Document 5.1 (“SRD 5.1”) by Wizards of the Coast LLC and available at [URL='https://dnd.wizards.com/resources/systems-reference-document']Systems Reference Document | Dungeons & Dragons[/URL]. The SRD 5.1 is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License available at [URL='https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode']Creative Commons — Attribution 4.0 International — CC BY 4.0[/URL] ." I'm curious if that is sufficient. It's basically the wording WotC asked for, but noting it is an adaptation. (In most cases it was spllicing together a bunch of creatures and spells - so naming them individually seemed unuseful). [/QUOTE]

Verification