Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
How viable is 5E to play at high levels?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Tony Vargas" data-source="post: 7217861" data-attributes="member: 996"><p>[sblock=Edition Stuff] The bottom line on the 'feelz' and 'Vtude' arguments was usually something that had been done to balance the classes, very often something done to make the martial classes better. </p><p></p><p>You'll notice that Sacrosanct dredged up that old 'samey' saw, which never held water, and had no answer to actual examples that illustrated just how different martial 'exploits' and arcane spells really were in 4e, he just kept getting madder and making it about 'insults.' </p><p></p><p> Sacrosanct, though, apparently needed to block me (you quoted a post I can't see, I don't feel like I'm missing much), even though I thought I made that fairly clear. </p><p>I can't say I'm surprised, the way he kept making the discussion personal instead of actually replying to the points being made. The edition war in miniature, really. </p><p></p><p>Ironically, his initial observation, equating 'balance' and 'the science of gaming' wasn't particularly off, he just couldn't seem to make it without re-fighting the edition war. I certainly didn't help. </p><p>Two shell-shocked veterans triggering eachother, I guess. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f641.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":(" title="Frown :(" data-smilie="3"data-shortname=":(" /></p><p></p><p> </p><p></p><p>Sorry y'all had to see any of that, but if you're lucky, you never looked under the cut, and aren't reading this.</p><p></p><p>...back to the thread...</p><p>[/sblock]</p><p></p><p> ...I think merely 'consistent' results might be acceptable... That goes towards experiences, sure, not that personal anecdotes need that much explaining if they're left at just that, rather than generalized or used as evidence.</p><p></p><p> As Sacrosanct pointed out, D&D had been er 'formulaically'-balanced & scientific in one ed, if not for very long, and 5e is meant to be for fans of all past editions, so the germ of making it that way should be in there. And, we do have CR & encounter-building, and encounters/rests/day guidelines that could be that germ.</p><p></p><p>(So, like, put on the surgical masks, those of you who don't want to be infected, especially if you visit the 'Elephant' thread...)</p><p></p><p> If you're referring to the book he said he thought would sell like hotcakes, it sounded more like a request for tools to facilitate making the game into something with more room for DMing on the 'science' side.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Tony Vargas, post: 7217861, member: 996"] [sblock=Edition Stuff] The bottom line on the 'feelz' and 'Vtude' arguments was usually something that had been done to balance the classes, very often something done to make the martial classes better. You'll notice that Sacrosanct dredged up that old 'samey' saw, which never held water, and had no answer to actual examples that illustrated just how different martial 'exploits' and arcane spells really were in 4e, he just kept getting madder and making it about 'insults.' Sacrosanct, though, apparently needed to block me (you quoted a post I can't see, I don't feel like I'm missing much), even though I thought I made that fairly clear. I can't say I'm surprised, the way he kept making the discussion personal instead of actually replying to the points being made. The edition war in miniature, really. Ironically, his initial observation, equating 'balance' and 'the science of gaming' wasn't particularly off, he just couldn't seem to make it without re-fighting the edition war. I certainly didn't help. Two shell-shocked veterans triggering eachother, I guess. :( Sorry y'all had to see any of that, but if you're lucky, you never looked under the cut, and aren't reading this. ...back to the thread... [/sblock] ...I think merely 'consistent' results might be acceptable... That goes towards experiences, sure, not that personal anecdotes need that much explaining if they're left at just that, rather than generalized or used as evidence. As Sacrosanct pointed out, D&D had been er 'formulaically'-balanced & scientific in one ed, if not for very long, and 5e is meant to be for fans of all past editions, so the germ of making it that way should be in there. And, we do have CR & encounter-building, and encounters/rests/day guidelines that could be that germ. (So, like, put on the surgical masks, those of you who don't want to be infected, especially if you visit the 'Elephant' thread...) If you're referring to the book he said he thought would sell like hotcakes, it sounded more like a request for tools to facilitate making the game into something with more room for DMing on the 'science' side. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
How viable is 5E to play at high levels?
Top