Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
How viable is 5E to play at high levels?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="CapnZapp" data-source="post: 7236077" data-attributes="member: 12731"><p>Okay, then, no, using too-high CR monsters give unsatisfying results since players complain tanking strategies does not work. </p><p></p><p>If you can't withstand the monster for more than a round even when optimizing for sturdiness, you choose other strategies, such as battlefield denial.</p><p></p><p>While there's nothing wrong with such strategies it tells me monsters don't work as solos straight out the box.</p><p></p><p>They need more actions and more hp but not higher damage, to summarize it crudely.</p><p></p><p>In short, and going straight to the point; what solos need is nothing less than being able to play by different rules than regular creatures.</p><p></p><p>They need more attacks and hit points than possible for a regular creature of a certain capacity.</p><p></p><p>It's like a Commoner with 30 hit points and two attacks, yet it still has no higher proficiency bonus, skills or stats. </p><p></p><p>The game puts requirements on a Solo combat that can't be met as long as you insist they play by the same generation/build rules as other monsters.</p><p></p><p>As long as WotC hesitates to give us such Solo rules they cannot succeed.</p><p></p><p>Sent from my C6603 using <a href="http://r.tapatalk.com/byo?rid=93205" target="_blank">EN World mobile app</a></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="CapnZapp, post: 7236077, member: 12731"] Okay, then, no, using too-high CR monsters give unsatisfying results since players complain tanking strategies does not work. If you can't withstand the monster for more than a round even when optimizing for sturdiness, you choose other strategies, such as battlefield denial. While there's nothing wrong with such strategies it tells me monsters don't work as solos straight out the box. They need more actions and more hp but not higher damage, to summarize it crudely. In short, and going straight to the point; what solos need is nothing less than being able to play by different rules than regular creatures. They need more attacks and hit points than possible for a regular creature of a certain capacity. It's like a Commoner with 30 hit points and two attacks, yet it still has no higher proficiency bonus, skills or stats. The game puts requirements on a Solo combat that can't be met as long as you insist they play by the same generation/build rules as other monsters. As long as WotC hesitates to give us such Solo rules they cannot succeed. Sent from my C6603 using [URL=http://r.tapatalk.com/byo?rid=93205]EN World mobile app[/URL] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
How viable is 5E to play at high levels?
Top