Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
How was the civil war not about slavery?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Oryan77" data-source="post: 5823765" data-attributes="member: 18701"><p>The Civil War was <em>about</em> slavery, but that is not what the war was fought over. Like usual, it was fought over money and power.</p><p></p><p>The thing people tend to do these days is relate "slavery" to "racism". People of the same race often enslave their own kind and that does not make them "racist". So in school, students are taught that slavery is of course bad, but it's implied that the southern states are "racist" while the northern states were not. So when you get into any kind of political debate, people ridicule the confederates as "the bad guys". It was a different time with different ways of thinking. There were no bad guys.</p><p></p><p>What really irks me is how people nowadays see a confederate flag as a symbol of racism. It is not. It's a symbol of the south and nothing more.</p><p></p><p>What the schools don't seem to explain to students is that yes, the Civil War <strong>was</strong> about slavery, but it was <strong>not</strong> an attempt to simply free them out of compassion. The Union was not trying to free slaves like knights on shining armor looking to help the black man. Northerners still did not see blacks as equals and they definitely were not simply going off to die so blacks would be free. </p><p></p><p>The war was fought over the fact that the northern farmers who paid their laborers had a harder time competing with southern farmers who owned slaves and did not pay them. They wanted to level the playing field, which meant they wanted southern farmers to pay for labor. That meant, ending slavery. So Northerners were going off to die for profit and power.</p><p></p><p>Regardless of what you see in movies, slaves were not all treated poorly by their owners. Many slaves stuck around and were hired on as paid laborers. The sad fact is most were seen as property, but that doesn't mean the "property" was not taken care of. If farmers were treating slaves poorly, then they can't work as good and if they are sick or dead, it costs the farmer more money to treat or get a new slave.</p><p></p><p>I'm not trying to downplay slavery or defend it. I'm just pointing out that people get caught up in what they see in film and our text books glorify our kindness to hide our greediness. What would you rather tell school children; that we ended slavery cause we are so compassionate, or that we ended slavery so we could make more money? So our textbooks gloss over the money issue.</p><p></p><p>Of course, there was still more to the war than this. But this was the gist of it if you want to look at the slavery issue.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Oryan77, post: 5823765, member: 18701"] The Civil War was [I]about[/I] slavery, but that is not what the war was fought over. Like usual, it was fought over money and power. The thing people tend to do these days is relate "slavery" to "racism". People of the same race often enslave their own kind and that does not make them "racist". So in school, students are taught that slavery is of course bad, but it's implied that the southern states are "racist" while the northern states were not. So when you get into any kind of political debate, people ridicule the confederates as "the bad guys". It was a different time with different ways of thinking. There were no bad guys. What really irks me is how people nowadays see a confederate flag as a symbol of racism. It is not. It's a symbol of the south and nothing more. What the schools don't seem to explain to students is that yes, the Civil War [B]was[/B] about slavery, but it was [B]not[/B] an attempt to simply free them out of compassion. The Union was not trying to free slaves like knights on shining armor looking to help the black man. Northerners still did not see blacks as equals and they definitely were not simply going off to die so blacks would be free. The war was fought over the fact that the northern farmers who paid their laborers had a harder time competing with southern farmers who owned slaves and did not pay them. They wanted to level the playing field, which meant they wanted southern farmers to pay for labor. That meant, ending slavery. So Northerners were going off to die for profit and power. Regardless of what you see in movies, slaves were not all treated poorly by their owners. Many slaves stuck around and were hired on as paid laborers. The sad fact is most were seen as property, but that doesn't mean the "property" was not taken care of. If farmers were treating slaves poorly, then they can't work as good and if they are sick or dead, it costs the farmer more money to treat or get a new slave. I'm not trying to downplay slavery or defend it. I'm just pointing out that people get caught up in what they see in film and our text books glorify our kindness to hide our greediness. What would you rather tell school children; that we ended slavery cause we are so compassionate, or that we ended slavery so we could make more money? So our textbooks gloss over the money issue. Of course, there was still more to the war than this. But this was the gist of it if you want to look at the slavery issue. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
How was the civil war not about slavery?
Top