Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
How well can a dedicated RPG GenAI perform?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Gorgon Zee" data-source="post: 9456148" data-attributes="member: 75787"><p><strong>if i have a party of size 6, and they are beign attacked by 2 trolls and 2 orcs, how many heroes can be in rearward stance? Explain your reasoning in a step by step fashion making sure that each step in your chain of reasoning derives logically from the previous one</strong></p><p></p><p>To determine how many heroes can be in Rearward stance when facing 2 Trolls and 2 Orcs, we need to follow the rules outlined in the One Ring game regarding combat stances and engagement limits. Here’s a step-by-step breakdown:</p><p></p><p>1. Understanding the Engagement Rules: According to the rules, Player-heroes can only assume a Rearward stance if the total number of enemies is not more than twice the number of adventurers in the Company. Additionally, for each Player-hero in Rearward, there must be two other adventurers fighting in Close Combat stances [Core-95].</p><p></p><p>2. Calculating the Total Number of Enemies: In this scenario, there are 2 Trolls and 2 Orcs, which totals to 4 enemies.</p><p></p><p>3. Calculating the Maximum Number of Player-heroes: The party consists of 6 Player-heroes. To determine if they can assume Rearward stance, we check the condition: the number of enemies (4) must not exceed twice the number of Player-heroes (6).</p><p> - Twice the number of Player-heroes: 2 x 6 = 12.</p><p> - Since 4 (the number of enemies) is less than 12, the first condition is satisfied.</p><p></p><p>4. Determining the Number of Player-heroes in Rearward Stance: Now, we need to consider the second condition: for each Player-hero in Rearward stance, there must be two other Player-heroes in Close Combat stances.</p><p> - If we let x be the number of Player-heroes in Rearward stance, then the number of Player-heroes in Close Combat stances must be at least 2x.</p><p></p><p>5. Setting Up the Equation: The total number of Player-heroes is 6, so we can set up the following equation:</p><p> - x (Rearward) + 2x (Close Combat) ≤ 6.</p><p> - This simplifies to 3x ≤ 6.</p><p></p><p>6. Solving for x: Dividing both sides of the equation by 3 gives:</p><p> - x ≤ 2.</p><p></p><p>7. Conclusion: Therefore, a maximum of 2 Player-heroes can be in Rearward stance while the remaining 4 must be in Close Combat stances to satisfy the engagement rules.</p><p></p><p>In summary, with a party of 6 facing 4 enemies (2 Trolls and 2 Orcs), up to 2 Player-heroes can be in Rearward stance while the other 4 must engage in Close Combat. This conclusion is derived logically from the engagement rules and the calculations based on the number of Player-heroes and enemies involved.</p><p></p><p><strong>NOTE: Whenever asking an LLM to do some reasoning, it's vital to tell it to show the steps in the reasoning. This is because it is WAY less likely to hallucinate a small step and so an answer composed of 6 small steps is much more likely to be correct than simply asking it to answer in one guess. It did well with this question</strong></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Gorgon Zee, post: 9456148, member: 75787"] [B]if i have a party of size 6, and they are beign attacked by 2 trolls and 2 orcs, how many heroes can be in rearward stance? Explain your reasoning in a step by step fashion making sure that each step in your chain of reasoning derives logically from the previous one[/B] To determine how many heroes can be in Rearward stance when facing 2 Trolls and 2 Orcs, we need to follow the rules outlined in the One Ring game regarding combat stances and engagement limits. Here’s a step-by-step breakdown: 1. Understanding the Engagement Rules: According to the rules, Player-heroes can only assume a Rearward stance if the total number of enemies is not more than twice the number of adventurers in the Company. Additionally, for each Player-hero in Rearward, there must be two other adventurers fighting in Close Combat stances [Core-95]. 2. Calculating the Total Number of Enemies: In this scenario, there are 2 Trolls and 2 Orcs, which totals to 4 enemies. 3. Calculating the Maximum Number of Player-heroes: The party consists of 6 Player-heroes. To determine if they can assume Rearward stance, we check the condition: the number of enemies (4) must not exceed twice the number of Player-heroes (6). - Twice the number of Player-heroes: 2 x 6 = 12. - Since 4 (the number of enemies) is less than 12, the first condition is satisfied. 4. Determining the Number of Player-heroes in Rearward Stance: Now, we need to consider the second condition: for each Player-hero in Rearward stance, there must be two other Player-heroes in Close Combat stances. - If we let x be the number of Player-heroes in Rearward stance, then the number of Player-heroes in Close Combat stances must be at least 2x. 5. Setting Up the Equation: The total number of Player-heroes is 6, so we can set up the following equation: - x (Rearward) + 2x (Close Combat) ≤ 6. - This simplifies to 3x ≤ 6. 6. Solving for x: Dividing both sides of the equation by 3 gives: - x ≤ 2. 7. Conclusion: Therefore, a maximum of 2 Player-heroes can be in Rearward stance while the remaining 4 must be in Close Combat stances to satisfy the engagement rules. In summary, with a party of 6 facing 4 enemies (2 Trolls and 2 Orcs), up to 2 Player-heroes can be in Rearward stance while the other 4 must engage in Close Combat. This conclusion is derived logically from the engagement rules and the calculations based on the number of Player-heroes and enemies involved. [B]NOTE: Whenever asking an LLM to do some reasoning, it's vital to tell it to show the steps in the reasoning. This is because it is WAY less likely to hallucinate a small step and so an answer composed of 6 small steps is much more likely to be correct than simply asking it to answer in one guess. It did well with this question[/B] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
How well can a dedicated RPG GenAI perform?
Top