Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Cergorach" data-source="post: 9464351" data-attributes="member: 725">How exactly? Copyright is about distribution as far as I understand it.Let's not start the discussion on whether or not a public trained LLM model is copyright theft or not, as that's not relevant here if the LMM model is not public.The assumption is that what's used in the model now 'global' ChatGPT is trained on. But that's only if you have that turned on, you can turn that off (opt out) in ChatGPT. Then it becomes that you train only your own 'LLM', that only you can use. Sure, you're not doing it all on your own hardware (but you could), but it's not copyright infringement when you buy the pdf and store it on cloud storage only you can access. It of course is a totally different issue when you make that available to others to read.Now, posting the results here might be considered copyright infringement, but how is this different from every other related ENworld thread that discusses an IP? Like D&D or LotR...The issue is imho more that people make different assumptions on what they read or heard somewhere and often the research they should do into the subject is thoroughly lacking. On both sides of the conversation. Using the wrong terms, doesn't help either: 'copyright theft' does not exist, it's 'copyright infringement'. An LLM doesn't 'think', it 'calculates', and it certainly doesn't know what a 'fact' is (not that many humans do either)...</blockquote>