Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
How wide is a "line", i.e. Lightning Bolt?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Jens" data-source="post: 1041759" data-attributes="member: 605"><p>I only have the SRD. It says:Now, that sounds simple to me. It sounds like the PHB has some more text that makes things complicated, but let's see what the SRD text implies. I especially note the last sentence since it invalidates a lot of what has been written above.</p><p></p><p>A line (which is one-dimensional) may touch an object without passing through it. This has a couple of implications:</p><p></p><p>- It is possible to cast a line-spell so that it doesn't affect any squares at all. Just cast it *exactly* along the lines separating the squares. Then it touches a lot of squares but doesn't pass through any at all. Alternatively, the line spell may be cast at a 'just about but not exactly' right angle, giving a row/column of affected squares.</p><p></p><p>- If a line-spell is cast at an angle *exactly* 45 degrees, it will touch (and thereby affect) only about half as many squares as it would had it been cast at an angle of 'just about but not exactly' 45 degrees.</p><p></p><p>Now, some may say that this makes the number for affected squares vary wildly, but they would be wrong. It would be *possible* to place the line in such a way that it would affect very few squares, but unless that is what is desired, the number of affected squares will be fairly constant.</p><p></p><p>Btw, how do you make those neat drawings/diagrams?</p><p></p><p>Of the diagrams above, only (all of) Tabarnak Smokeblower's (with the red squares unaffected) and Caliban's #5 and #7 are correct, the rest are not because they allow squares to be affected without being passed through.</p><p></p><p>Note: Aiming a spell in such a way that it touches a square without passing through is difficult. Out of a continuum of direction, it has to be cast in one specific direction. It's like picking a rational number from the set of real numbers, if you know what I mean (and if you don't nevermind <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" />)</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Jens, post: 1041759, member: 605"] I only have the SRD. It says:Now, that sounds simple to me. It sounds like the PHB has some more text that makes things complicated, but let's see what the SRD text implies. I especially note the last sentence since it invalidates a lot of what has been written above. A line (which is one-dimensional) may touch an object without passing through it. This has a couple of implications: - It is possible to cast a line-spell so that it doesn't affect any squares at all. Just cast it *exactly* along the lines separating the squares. Then it touches a lot of squares but doesn't pass through any at all. Alternatively, the line spell may be cast at a 'just about but not exactly' right angle, giving a row/column of affected squares. - If a line-spell is cast at an angle *exactly* 45 degrees, it will touch (and thereby affect) only about half as many squares as it would had it been cast at an angle of 'just about but not exactly' 45 degrees. Now, some may say that this makes the number for affected squares vary wildly, but they would be wrong. It would be *possible* to place the line in such a way that it would affect very few squares, but unless that is what is desired, the number of affected squares will be fairly constant. Btw, how do you make those neat drawings/diagrams? Of the diagrams above, only (all of) Tabarnak Smokeblower's (with the red squares unaffected) and Caliban's #5 and #7 are correct, the rest are not because they allow squares to be affected without being passed through. Note: Aiming a spell in such a way that it touches a square without passing through is difficult. Out of a continuum of direction, it has to be cast in one specific direction. It's like picking a rational number from the set of real numbers, if you know what I mean (and if you don't nevermind :)) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
How wide is a "line", i.e. Lightning Bolt?
Top