Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
How will the designers (or the players) deal with magic item influx due to PC death?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="DM_Blake" data-source="post: 4132698" data-attributes="member: 57267"><p>I will tell you why not:</p><p></p><p>Simply put, <em>this doesn't need a rule.</em></p><p></p><p>This will vary from campaign to campaign, from gaming table to gaming table, from adventuring group to adventuring group, even from one item to another item of the dead guy's gear.</p><p></p><p>There is an entire sub-plottish world to explore. Some groups won't want to explore this. Other groups will enjoy the rich possibility of alignment issues, legal issues, NPC greed issues, and other story elements that can arise from this kind of thing.</p><p></p><p>Putting a single, heavy-handed rule in the DMG that mandates handling this in one certain way, regardless of what way is chosen by the DMG's writers, means that all the other gaming groups out there who would have enjoyed handling it differently are left out in the cold, or forced to house rule against the written word.</p><p></p><p>No, what this needs, instead of a rule, is some discussion in the DMG about character death, a few paragraphs that explore the possibilities, the ramifications, and the possible game-breakage of overpowering the survivors and how a DM can cope with that. </p><p></p><p>This should all be laid out in a format of "if you do this, then these things might be problems that you can handle by doing these things. If you do this other thing, then these other things might be problems that you can handle by doing these other things."</p><p></p><p>There might even be a paragraph like "We suggest handling it this way, because that seems to work best within the framework of other rules and guidelines of the D&D system as published, but it is still up to you, the DM, to determine what works best for you and your players."</p><p></p><p>That's how it should be handled in the DMG.</p><p></p><p>This way DMs can decide how to handle it, and the major pros and cons of their decision will be known in advance so later in the game they won't be surprised by consequences of the decision they made.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="DM_Blake, post: 4132698, member: 57267"] I will tell you why not: Simply put, [I]this doesn't need a rule.[/I] This will vary from campaign to campaign, from gaming table to gaming table, from adventuring group to adventuring group, even from one item to another item of the dead guy's gear. There is an entire sub-plottish world to explore. Some groups won't want to explore this. Other groups will enjoy the rich possibility of alignment issues, legal issues, NPC greed issues, and other story elements that can arise from this kind of thing. Putting a single, heavy-handed rule in the DMG that mandates handling this in one certain way, regardless of what way is chosen by the DMG's writers, means that all the other gaming groups out there who would have enjoyed handling it differently are left out in the cold, or forced to house rule against the written word. No, what this needs, instead of a rule, is some discussion in the DMG about character death, a few paragraphs that explore the possibilities, the ramifications, and the possible game-breakage of overpowering the survivors and how a DM can cope with that. This should all be laid out in a format of "if you do this, then these things might be problems that you can handle by doing these things. If you do this other thing, then these other things might be problems that you can handle by doing these other things." There might even be a paragraph like "We suggest handling it this way, because that seems to work best within the framework of other rules and guidelines of the D&D system as published, but it is still up to you, the DM, to determine what works best for you and your players." That's how it should be handled in the DMG. This way DMs can decide how to handle it, and the major pros and cons of their decision will be known in advance so later in the game they won't be surprised by consequences of the decision they made. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
How will the designers (or the players) deal with magic item influx due to PC death?
Top