Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
How will you handle this?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="theNater" data-source="post: 4222144" data-attributes="member: 62560"><p>The thing to do here is to identify why she likes druids, then model that as best you can. If she likes to be a healer, a cleric or a warlord can model that nicely. You may need to replace one of their traditional class skills with the Nature skill, and you will want to reflavor the fluff, but that can be done with a little work. </p><p>If she enjoys the druid's nature based attack spells, a fey pact warlock can be a solid druid, again with some reflavor. Alternately, the cleric has a few more attack spells than its third edition counterpart, and the damage types on those can be changed from radiant to fire or electricity as appropriate for the equivalent druid spell.</p><p>If it's the shapeshifting that she likes, we are presented with some more difficulties. However, I notice that 3.5 druids do not aquire wild shape until level five. If you start your new campaign at level 1, you do have some time before shapeshifting would be expected, and can hope for the relevant materials to be released in time. If you are starting at a level where shapeshifting is expected, my thought is to have her create two(or more) characters, each of which represents a different form, and replace one encounter power for each character with a shapeshift power that permits form transformation. Perhaps a cleric for the gnome form, a two-weapon fighting ranger for the badger form(two claws instead of two swords), a two-handed weapon fighter for the wolf form(big, tough, painful bite), rogue for the snake form(with sneak attack damage being flavored into the poisonous bite), and so on.</p><p>If she likes druids because of the animal companion, things get really tricky. The difficulty with animal companions is that they essentially provide the player with a second round worth of activity each round of combat. You could go the non-combat companion route, in which the animal companion is present but not a force on the battlefield. A tiny viper, a mouse, or a hawk could be along and not be expected to fight. Alternately, you could find a helpful second party member who has a class but no race picked out and do an animal character as with a shapeshifted form. This would require some good teamwork from the two of them, but could make for memorable play.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Sorcerers are not in the first Player's Handbook for fourth edition. However, the primary mechanical differences between the sorcerer and wizard in third edition were the attribute on which spellcasting was based and the sorcerer's ability to cast spells spontaneously. With the nature of powers in fourth edition, wizards now cast more or less spontaneously. So if you were to take a wizard and swap Int and Cha every time they appear, you'd have a pretty solid sorcerer. (We don't know if the wizard has any powers controlled by Cha, but if he does, those should be turned to Int for the sorcerer, so the sorcerer has the same selection of powers based on the primary attribute.)</p><p>Wizards in fourth edition have shown some tendency to prepare spells; the sample wizards we've seen have known two daily spells, and must select one of them for the day at the end of an extended rest(sleeping overnight). For the sorcerers, you could say they only know one daily spell, but may cast it twice a day, not more than once per encounter. Gives a bit of the fewer spells known/more spells per day feel.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="theNater, post: 4222144, member: 62560"] The thing to do here is to identify why she likes druids, then model that as best you can. If she likes to be a healer, a cleric or a warlord can model that nicely. You may need to replace one of their traditional class skills with the Nature skill, and you will want to reflavor the fluff, but that can be done with a little work. If she enjoys the druid's nature based attack spells, a fey pact warlock can be a solid druid, again with some reflavor. Alternately, the cleric has a few more attack spells than its third edition counterpart, and the damage types on those can be changed from radiant to fire or electricity as appropriate for the equivalent druid spell. If it's the shapeshifting that she likes, we are presented with some more difficulties. However, I notice that 3.5 druids do not aquire wild shape until level five. If you start your new campaign at level 1, you do have some time before shapeshifting would be expected, and can hope for the relevant materials to be released in time. If you are starting at a level where shapeshifting is expected, my thought is to have her create two(or more) characters, each of which represents a different form, and replace one encounter power for each character with a shapeshift power that permits form transformation. Perhaps a cleric for the gnome form, a two-weapon fighting ranger for the badger form(two claws instead of two swords), a two-handed weapon fighter for the wolf form(big, tough, painful bite), rogue for the snake form(with sneak attack damage being flavored into the poisonous bite), and so on. If she likes druids because of the animal companion, things get really tricky. The difficulty with animal companions is that they essentially provide the player with a second round worth of activity each round of combat. You could go the non-combat companion route, in which the animal companion is present but not a force on the battlefield. A tiny viper, a mouse, or a hawk could be along and not be expected to fight. Alternately, you could find a helpful second party member who has a class but no race picked out and do an animal character as with a shapeshifted form. This would require some good teamwork from the two of them, but could make for memorable play. Sorcerers are not in the first Player's Handbook for fourth edition. However, the primary mechanical differences between the sorcerer and wizard in third edition were the attribute on which spellcasting was based and the sorcerer's ability to cast spells spontaneously. With the nature of powers in fourth edition, wizards now cast more or less spontaneously. So if you were to take a wizard and swap Int and Cha every time they appear, you'd have a pretty solid sorcerer. (We don't know if the wizard has any powers controlled by Cha, but if he does, those should be turned to Int for the sorcerer, so the sorcerer has the same selection of powers based on the primary attribute.) Wizards in fourth edition have shown some tendency to prepare spells; the sample wizards we've seen have known two daily spells, and must select one of them for the day at the end of an extended rest(sleeping overnight). For the sorcerers, you could say they only know one daily spell, but may cast it twice a day, not more than once per encounter. Gives a bit of the fewer spells known/more spells per day feel. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
How will you handle this?
Top