Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
How Wizards of the Coast Could Slay in Profit
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Shemeska" data-source="post: 5843600" data-attributes="member: 11697"><p>It's potentially a really good idea, but there are some logistical and some ideological stumbling points I can see looming. Right now it's arguable that they're running pretty tight on having the staff available for the e-zines to put out 4e content on time and in reasonable amount each month for subscriber expectations. </p><p></p><p>If they start accepting material for 1e/2e/3e/OD&D/BECMI/etc how much more heavily is that going to tax their resources if they want to devote the proper time to editing and playtesting material? And would that cause errors to trickle in due to confusion between related rulesets? Do they have people on staff that are intimately familiar with each of the possible rulesets, and people good enough with the edition specific lore for various campaign settings? That's potentially a lot of extra staff they might need to hire, and a lot of dividing up their time. Wanting to avoid stretched resources away from what they know best is for instance one of the reasons Paizo gave for not being interested in doing 4e material.</p><p></p><p>Another stumbling block is how to handle articles for various settings. If for instance (completely hypothetical here) I wanted to write an article set in the 3e/1370ish era for FR, even if that article was using 3e rules and set in the 3e era FR timeline, would I be required to assume that everything that happened (or was retconned in) with 4e FR for instance needed to be strictly adhered to? And if I did, what's the point then of trying to do 3.x era support if it's not going to be completely supporting it? Would WotC be willing to let folks write for different eras of campaign setting support and possibly introduce (accidentally, or intentionally) things that conflict with later era/edition continuity?</p><p></p><p>Allowing true multiple era support could be something of an insane editorial headache given the rather, umm, conflicted (to say it nicely) feelings about some eras versus others (pre and post Spellplague 4e, post Faction War Planescape, etc).</p><p></p><p>That said, I'd jump through flaming hoops to do some Planescape articles (either pre or post Faction War, I like it all). <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Shemeska, post: 5843600, member: 11697"] It's potentially a really good idea, but there are some logistical and some ideological stumbling points I can see looming. Right now it's arguable that they're running pretty tight on having the staff available for the e-zines to put out 4e content on time and in reasonable amount each month for subscriber expectations. If they start accepting material for 1e/2e/3e/OD&D/BECMI/etc how much more heavily is that going to tax their resources if they want to devote the proper time to editing and playtesting material? And would that cause errors to trickle in due to confusion between related rulesets? Do they have people on staff that are intimately familiar with each of the possible rulesets, and people good enough with the edition specific lore for various campaign settings? That's potentially a lot of extra staff they might need to hire, and a lot of dividing up their time. Wanting to avoid stretched resources away from what they know best is for instance one of the reasons Paizo gave for not being interested in doing 4e material. Another stumbling block is how to handle articles for various settings. If for instance (completely hypothetical here) I wanted to write an article set in the 3e/1370ish era for FR, even if that article was using 3e rules and set in the 3e era FR timeline, would I be required to assume that everything that happened (or was retconned in) with 4e FR for instance needed to be strictly adhered to? And if I did, what's the point then of trying to do 3.x era support if it's not going to be completely supporting it? Would WotC be willing to let folks write for different eras of campaign setting support and possibly introduce (accidentally, or intentionally) things that conflict with later era/edition continuity? Allowing true multiple era support could be something of an insane editorial headache given the rather, umm, conflicted (to say it nicely) feelings about some eras versus others (pre and post Spellplague 4e, post Faction War Planescape, etc). That said, I'd jump through flaming hoops to do some Planescape articles (either pre or post Faction War, I like it all). ;) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
How Wizards of the Coast Could Slay in Profit
Top