Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
How would you change the new Star Wars trilogy
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Imaculata" data-source="post: 7886856" data-attributes="member: 6801286"><p>Lucas said in an interview that Hollywood is afraid to do anything new. When he made the original Star Wars, that was a new idea. Hollywood took a gamble and won. But movie making has changed (in his opinion) and now everything is safe. While I ultimately hated his prequels, I agree with his sentiments.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>To be honest I didn't like the first Star Trek movie he made either. I thought it was loud, obnoxious and dumb, and it looked like the entire movie had been shot through the reflection of a window.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>There's a big difference though. The original Star Wars was a stand alone movie. The two movies that followed were all written by the same people, with the same vision. Lucas was involved with all three movies. In contrast, The Force Awakens was not intended as a stand alone movie. It had a vision, and Rian Johnson had a totally different vision with The Last Jedi that killed off a lot of the things set up in The Force Awakens. Then JJ Abrams returned for Rise of Skywalker, and obviously didn't agree with Rian's vision, so we get a different take yet again that kills off most of the direction that Last Jedi was going in. Now add in the high likelyhood that Disney also meddled in JJ's vision with the last movie, and we get a big steaming mess. There was no overal vision for the whole trilogy.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I agree that they should have had the same vision throughout all three movies, and not have three completely different ideas on where to go with the story. I don't think it is a matter of director incompetence. I believe it is a matter of <u>studio</u> incompetence.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I'd say that it didn't set the stage for the followup at all. It ignored several plotlines from the previous movie, such as the Knights of Ren. It didn't set up the threat for the next movie, and instead killed off the main villain a movie too soon (Kylo Ren clearly was never meant to be the main threat nor a replacement for Snoke). TLJ does have some interesting ideas (such as Rey and Kylo's force connection), but it presented no satisfying answers to the questions that The Force Awakens raised on purpose and didn't leave anywhere for the third movie to go.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Imaculata, post: 7886856, member: 6801286"] Lucas said in an interview that Hollywood is afraid to do anything new. When he made the original Star Wars, that was a new idea. Hollywood took a gamble and won. But movie making has changed (in his opinion) and now everything is safe. While I ultimately hated his prequels, I agree with his sentiments. To be honest I didn't like the first Star Trek movie he made either. I thought it was loud, obnoxious and dumb, and it looked like the entire movie had been shot through the reflection of a window. There's a big difference though. The original Star Wars was a stand alone movie. The two movies that followed were all written by the same people, with the same vision. Lucas was involved with all three movies. In contrast, The Force Awakens was not intended as a stand alone movie. It had a vision, and Rian Johnson had a totally different vision with The Last Jedi that killed off a lot of the things set up in The Force Awakens. Then JJ Abrams returned for Rise of Skywalker, and obviously didn't agree with Rian's vision, so we get a different take yet again that kills off most of the direction that Last Jedi was going in. Now add in the high likelyhood that Disney also meddled in JJ's vision with the last movie, and we get a big steaming mess. There was no overal vision for the whole trilogy. I agree that they should have had the same vision throughout all three movies, and not have three completely different ideas on where to go with the story. I don't think it is a matter of director incompetence. I believe it is a matter of [U]studio[/U] incompetence. I'd say that it didn't set the stage for the followup at all. It ignored several plotlines from the previous movie, such as the Knights of Ren. It didn't set up the threat for the next movie, and instead killed off the main villain a movie too soon (Kylo Ren clearly was never meant to be the main threat nor a replacement for Snoke). TLJ does have some interesting ideas (such as Rey and Kylo's force connection), but it presented no satisfying answers to the questions that The Force Awakens raised on purpose and didn't leave anywhere for the third movie to go. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
How would you change the new Star Wars trilogy
Top