Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
NOW LIVE! Today's the day you meet your new best friend. You don’t have to leave Wolfy behind... In 'Pets & Sidekicks' your companions level up with you!
Community
Meta - Forums About Forums
Archive-threads
How Would You Defend A Mountain Fortress? (Volume II)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="SHARK" data-source="post: 330082" data-attributes="member: 1131"><p>Greetings!</p><p></p><p>Posted by Maldur:</p><p>____________________________________________________</p><p>Quote:</p><p></p><p>"SHARK, I was just wondering this as I never ran a high level campaign, and I have no idea how much influence epic characters can have on the history of a world ( wotc still hasn't delivered ELH in the Netherlands, so I have no help from that either). </p><p>____________________________________________________</p><p>End Quote.</p><p></p><p>Well, as mmadsen mentioned, the ELH doesn't really adress the subject of epic-level players influencing the campaign world. As for myself, I like the idea of players affecting the campaign world. I think that the Game Master should build in, that is to say inherently, a buffer-capacity for the players to have a significant affect upon the campaign world. Why not? If the Game Master is very rigic in controlling every little thing that the players can do and affect, then really, what does the Game Master need the players for? The Game Master is then really writing a novel, and the players are simply a dramatic distraction, wouldn't it seem?</p><p></p><p>I must say, that my players love having this kind of power, this kind of awesome ability to affect history, and the destiny of peoples and nations. Try it! Who needs a Vorpal Sword?<img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /> Really, though, it can also be seen as a "story award" or form of reward, to the players, rather than mountains of treasure or some new magic item. How about an army of 100,000 soldiers to do thy will? I can allow literally mountains of treasure to fall into the party's hands--because they have an army to share it with. The pride, the prestige, the political power and leverage gained within the campaign by having the command of an army is--in itself--very influential, and intoxicating. It makes a fine reward itself. </p><p></p><p>Posted by Maldur</p><p>____________________________________________________</p><p>Quote:</p><p></p><p>"Isn't it really hard to plan the future history of your world, when you let actions of characters influence it all? How can you plan any long term effents that way? Your world scope must be enourmous.</p><p>____________________________________________________</p><p>End Quote.</p><p></p><p>Hmmm...well, keep in mind that the rest of the "world" is doing its own thing. There is stuff going on throughout the world all the time. The players, after all, can't be everywhere!<img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /> However, as to affecting large regions, again, why not?<img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /> I plan future events *loosely*--as opposed to hard and fast--so that players can have an affect, if they desire to do so. If not, or if they fail, then the events that I loosely planned get more detail, and become a part of the new reality. Indeed, my world scope is enormous! I have a world that is the size of Jupiter!<img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></p><p></p><p>Posted by Maldur</p><p>____________________________________________________</p><p>Quote: </p><p></p><p>"What do you base your gamemastering on? A timeline? A geograpic description? Do you create adventures? Or do you present situations for the characters to react to? Images of things you want characters to see or get involved in?</p><p></p><p>My gamemastering is driven by images, not clever plans, so when this thread came up I was trying to picture this massive campaign. And it was very hard to get a clear picture, which was intense enough for this struggle. Now after two threads of ideas ( ranging from very nice and epic to very silly ( sorry but the flying spiders are very silly, IMHO)) I can see some scenes.</p><p></p><p>But the scale is enourmous (your legions start looking like Ceasar's 10th) A battle field/ campaign with about a million combatants in one area, the book keeping alone would be a task. Do you have a "aide du camp" when you run games ?" </p><p>____________________________________________________</p><p>End Quote.</p><p></p><p>It's kinda funny that you mention it Maldur, because, as mmadsen wrote, it is both. It is both vivid images, and clever plans! Mmadsen is very good at grasping my thoughts on the matter. He and I tend to think along very similar lines of thought!<img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /> It's great! You see, Maldur, I tend to plan what I must--the essentials of something, or a framework--whatever is absolutely necessary. The rest, I like to "image" or just run with the "imaging film" in my head, and the detail provided by that process, combined with the player's actions and responses, will dictate what else needs to be precisely detailed, if that makes any sense. Does it? The image of a vast plain filled with rank upon rank of legionnaires, all waiting for the orders to march is breathtaking! The players look out on the ranks of troops, the groups of heavy cavalry, the ranks of engineers, wagons filled with the tools of war, the clusters of Vallorean priests, their chanting and holy oaths carving glowing runes within the very air as the clouds run to gather and do their bidding; the horses are calm...the war dogs chomp and bark with excitement; the Vallorean wizards sweep through the vast formations, their hands waving through the cool air, casting forth their spells upon the host in readiness for battle; Prayers are uttered forth as they loudly echo across the plain for all to hear; as one, the soldiers kneel in prayer; finally, the banners are raised high, the trumpets have sounded readiness; several tribunes and generals approach the players--who are in command--and ask, "My lords, do we march?" With a swift command, the generals proceed. With fifes, and a long, roaring drumroll that breaks into a cadence, the legions rise, form up, and begin the march to the horizon.</p><p></p><p>The legions will march into Hell itself if they are commanded to do so. They march with utter trust and devotion in Vallorea, and in their commanders. The legionnaires know that they shall be victorious. Why? Because in 2,000 years, the Vallorean Empire has lost many battles, but has never lost a war.</p><p></p><p>The legions march onward, the dust swirling about them as the columns of troops stretch out, the lines of horsemen galloping here and there, and the dogs capering about. Overhead, a group of summoned Giant Eagles, patrons to the Legions, fly over them, watching for enemies.<img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></p><p></p><p>Posted by Maldur</p><p>____________________________________________________</p><p>Quote:</p><p></p><p>"Reading your and Mmadsens ideas and seeing the amount of research you guys put into creating your games, makes me feel bad. It also inspires me to increase the effort I put into my games, playing a less "off-the-cuff" game and presenting a more eleborate and complete world to my players. I really like world building, as do you it seems, but it looks like like your in the fortunate position that you can make it more of a team effort with players who assist you more when doing just that. </p><p></p><p>Sorry if this answer turned into a more personal note, and I hope it makes sense( words always get stuck some where between my head and the paper)."</p><p>____________________________________________________</p><p>End Quote.</p><p></p><p>I do hope it inspires you Maldur! Remember, though, it is *both* clever plans, and bold, vivid images! I say let your images go! Run wild with the images, and let the players join them! Let the players help create additional images, and worry about the details as you go! Let your campaign be big enough to hold your visions! I can understand your reticence for doing this--but really, it frees the game up into really being a vehicle of wondrous imagination! </p><p></p><p>My own players are chomping at the bit with the prospect of leading vast armies in desperate battle! The fate of cities, of peoples, of nations, teeter and stagger by their actions, by their decisions! How much greater a reward can there be? Indeed, the players are feverish in their own plans and strategies for carrying out such an epic battle in the campaign! It's going to blend enormous battle between huge armies across a blasted, hellish battlefield, mixed with desperate, clandestine raids behind enemy lines, with deep assaults into dark, terrifying dungeons! They know they are going to face undead, demons, ferocious soldiers, and horrible monsters from the gibbering darkness!</p><p></p><p>Semper Fidelis,</p><p></p><p>SHARK</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="SHARK, post: 330082, member: 1131"] Greetings! Posted by Maldur: ____________________________________________________ Quote: "SHARK, I was just wondering this as I never ran a high level campaign, and I have no idea how much influence epic characters can have on the history of a world ( wotc still hasn't delivered ELH in the Netherlands, so I have no help from that either). ____________________________________________________ End Quote. Well, as mmadsen mentioned, the ELH doesn't really adress the subject of epic-level players influencing the campaign world. As for myself, I like the idea of players affecting the campaign world. I think that the Game Master should build in, that is to say inherently, a buffer-capacity for the players to have a significant affect upon the campaign world. Why not? If the Game Master is very rigic in controlling every little thing that the players can do and affect, then really, what does the Game Master need the players for? The Game Master is then really writing a novel, and the players are simply a dramatic distraction, wouldn't it seem? I must say, that my players love having this kind of power, this kind of awesome ability to affect history, and the destiny of peoples and nations. Try it! Who needs a Vorpal Sword?:) Really, though, it can also be seen as a "story award" or form of reward, to the players, rather than mountains of treasure or some new magic item. How about an army of 100,000 soldiers to do thy will? I can allow literally mountains of treasure to fall into the party's hands--because they have an army to share it with. The pride, the prestige, the political power and leverage gained within the campaign by having the command of an army is--in itself--very influential, and intoxicating. It makes a fine reward itself. Posted by Maldur ____________________________________________________ Quote: "Isn't it really hard to plan the future history of your world, when you let actions of characters influence it all? How can you plan any long term effents that way? Your world scope must be enourmous. ____________________________________________________ End Quote. Hmmm...well, keep in mind that the rest of the "world" is doing its own thing. There is stuff going on throughout the world all the time. The players, after all, can't be everywhere!:) However, as to affecting large regions, again, why not?:) I plan future events *loosely*--as opposed to hard and fast--so that players can have an affect, if they desire to do so. If not, or if they fail, then the events that I loosely planned get more detail, and become a part of the new reality. Indeed, my world scope is enormous! I have a world that is the size of Jupiter!:) Posted by Maldur ____________________________________________________ Quote: "What do you base your gamemastering on? A timeline? A geograpic description? Do you create adventures? Or do you present situations for the characters to react to? Images of things you want characters to see or get involved in? My gamemastering is driven by images, not clever plans, so when this thread came up I was trying to picture this massive campaign. And it was very hard to get a clear picture, which was intense enough for this struggle. Now after two threads of ideas ( ranging from very nice and epic to very silly ( sorry but the flying spiders are very silly, IMHO)) I can see some scenes. But the scale is enourmous (your legions start looking like Ceasar's 10th) A battle field/ campaign with about a million combatants in one area, the book keeping alone would be a task. Do you have a "aide du camp" when you run games ?" ____________________________________________________ End Quote. It's kinda funny that you mention it Maldur, because, as mmadsen wrote, it is both. It is both vivid images, and clever plans! Mmadsen is very good at grasping my thoughts on the matter. He and I tend to think along very similar lines of thought!:) It's great! You see, Maldur, I tend to plan what I must--the essentials of something, or a framework--whatever is absolutely necessary. The rest, I like to "image" or just run with the "imaging film" in my head, and the detail provided by that process, combined with the player's actions and responses, will dictate what else needs to be precisely detailed, if that makes any sense. Does it? The image of a vast plain filled with rank upon rank of legionnaires, all waiting for the orders to march is breathtaking! The players look out on the ranks of troops, the groups of heavy cavalry, the ranks of engineers, wagons filled with the tools of war, the clusters of Vallorean priests, their chanting and holy oaths carving glowing runes within the very air as the clouds run to gather and do their bidding; the horses are calm...the war dogs chomp and bark with excitement; the Vallorean wizards sweep through the vast formations, their hands waving through the cool air, casting forth their spells upon the host in readiness for battle; Prayers are uttered forth as they loudly echo across the plain for all to hear; as one, the soldiers kneel in prayer; finally, the banners are raised high, the trumpets have sounded readiness; several tribunes and generals approach the players--who are in command--and ask, "My lords, do we march?" With a swift command, the generals proceed. With fifes, and a long, roaring drumroll that breaks into a cadence, the legions rise, form up, and begin the march to the horizon. The legions will march into Hell itself if they are commanded to do so. They march with utter trust and devotion in Vallorea, and in their commanders. The legionnaires know that they shall be victorious. Why? Because in 2,000 years, the Vallorean Empire has lost many battles, but has never lost a war. The legions march onward, the dust swirling about them as the columns of troops stretch out, the lines of horsemen galloping here and there, and the dogs capering about. Overhead, a group of summoned Giant Eagles, patrons to the Legions, fly over them, watching for enemies.:) Posted by Maldur ____________________________________________________ Quote: "Reading your and Mmadsens ideas and seeing the amount of research you guys put into creating your games, makes me feel bad. It also inspires me to increase the effort I put into my games, playing a less "off-the-cuff" game and presenting a more eleborate and complete world to my players. I really like world building, as do you it seems, but it looks like like your in the fortunate position that you can make it more of a team effort with players who assist you more when doing just that. Sorry if this answer turned into a more personal note, and I hope it makes sense( words always get stuck some where between my head and the paper)." ____________________________________________________ End Quote. I do hope it inspires you Maldur! Remember, though, it is *both* clever plans, and bold, vivid images! I say let your images go! Run wild with the images, and let the players join them! Let the players help create additional images, and worry about the details as you go! Let your campaign be big enough to hold your visions! I can understand your reticence for doing this--but really, it frees the game up into really being a vehicle of wondrous imagination! My own players are chomping at the bit with the prospect of leading vast armies in desperate battle! The fate of cities, of peoples, of nations, teeter and stagger by their actions, by their decisions! How much greater a reward can there be? Indeed, the players are feverish in their own plans and strategies for carrying out such an epic battle in the campaign! It's going to blend enormous battle between huge armies across a blasted, hellish battlefield, mixed with desperate, clandestine raids behind enemy lines, with deep assaults into dark, terrifying dungeons! They know they are going to face undead, demons, ferocious soldiers, and horrible monsters from the gibbering darkness! Semper Fidelis, SHARK [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
Meta - Forums About Forums
Archive-threads
How Would You Defend A Mountain Fortress? (Volume II)
Top