Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
Meta - Forums About Forums
Archive-threads
How Would You Defend A Mountain Fortress?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Crowe9107" data-source="post: 286397" data-attributes="member: 2033"><p>3:1 odds is about the minimum feasible force required for an assault. Their experience level as I understand it [Average Vallorean Legionaire is 5th Level, our Galleran Grunts about 2nd level], is a tremendous force mulitplier though, and we will be hard pressed to go toe-to-toe with Vallorean units on a conventional battlefield. Also, the Valloreans appear fairly integrated, while we have a mix of LE and CE forces, which reallistically would not work well together.</p><p></p><p>Our primary mission is to DELAY the Vallorean Forces and deny them the opportunity to link up and reinforce the Vallorean Main Body. Holing up in Fortress Indestructible will probably not accomplish this, the Valloreans will simply manuever around us, capture our 2 supporting cities, and mop us up later when they have the time and resources to dig us out. While our presence would threaten them, their occupying forces could meet us from defensive positions, and WE would be the ones needing 3:1 odds, probably even higher numbers than that given the Valloreans experience. Granted, those occupied cities should be unfriendly, but as the goody-goody's, it may be seen as a liberation as the common citizens won't have to worry about becoming blood donors for vampires, or werewolf chow under Vallorean rule. I think at the very least, the Vallorean Army will split,and strike both cities simultaneously, with possibly a third blocking force to meet any sally or counterattack from the Fortress. This, is how I would play it if I was the Valloreans. They may just charge the fortress first, concentrating their strength on the hardest objectives while they are fresh, and then work their way to the cities, but it sounds kind of masochistic to me. It is hard to predict without a clear idea of the Vallorean objectives and their mindset. I think we need to be looking outside of the fortress for a place to take out the Valloreans, the more territory they take, the harder it will be for us to get at them. I think, the Valloreans expect us to cower in front of their might and hide behind our walls. I think they are supremely confident of their abilities and the righteousness of their cause. If these things are correct, a well played ambush/trap not on their timetable in an unexpected location, could seriously disrupt their plans.</p><p></p><p>Thoughts?</p><p></p><p>Carl Rowe</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Crowe9107, post: 286397, member: 2033"] 3:1 odds is about the minimum feasible force required for an assault. Their experience level as I understand it [Average Vallorean Legionaire is 5th Level, our Galleran Grunts about 2nd level], is a tremendous force mulitplier though, and we will be hard pressed to go toe-to-toe with Vallorean units on a conventional battlefield. Also, the Valloreans appear fairly integrated, while we have a mix of LE and CE forces, which reallistically would not work well together. Our primary mission is to DELAY the Vallorean Forces and deny them the opportunity to link up and reinforce the Vallorean Main Body. Holing up in Fortress Indestructible will probably not accomplish this, the Valloreans will simply manuever around us, capture our 2 supporting cities, and mop us up later when they have the time and resources to dig us out. While our presence would threaten them, their occupying forces could meet us from defensive positions, and WE would be the ones needing 3:1 odds, probably even higher numbers than that given the Valloreans experience. Granted, those occupied cities should be unfriendly, but as the goody-goody's, it may be seen as a liberation as the common citizens won't have to worry about becoming blood donors for vampires, or werewolf chow under Vallorean rule. I think at the very least, the Vallorean Army will split,and strike both cities simultaneously, with possibly a third blocking force to meet any sally or counterattack from the Fortress. This, is how I would play it if I was the Valloreans. They may just charge the fortress first, concentrating their strength on the hardest objectives while they are fresh, and then work their way to the cities, but it sounds kind of masochistic to me. It is hard to predict without a clear idea of the Vallorean objectives and their mindset. I think we need to be looking outside of the fortress for a place to take out the Valloreans, the more territory they take, the harder it will be for us to get at them. I think, the Valloreans expect us to cower in front of their might and hide behind our walls. I think they are supremely confident of their abilities and the righteousness of their cause. If these things are correct, a well played ambush/trap not on their timetable in an unexpected location, could seriously disrupt their plans. Thoughts? Carl Rowe [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
Meta - Forums About Forums
Archive-threads
How Would You Defend A Mountain Fortress?
Top